Browse > Home / Archive by category 'VP Prospects'

| Subcribe via RSS

***Ads Do Not Necessarily Represent The Opinions of the Staff of comMITTed to Romney***

***Support comMITTed to Romney by visiting our sponsors***

Profile Image of John Cronin
John Cronin

Mitt Romney Lands in Denver, No News on VP Pick

Every time I log on to the computer, somewhere in the back of my mind is the VP selection. So far, nothing today.

On another topic, what did you think of Sen. Kennedy’s speech last night? I thought he did a fine job, especially considering his health challenges. It was good to see pictures of Teddy and JFK and RFK when they were young. The film of him piloting his sailboat and quizzing his grandkids on the correct terminology of the different sails was really touching.

Although we are on different planets politically, it was good to remember the human aspects of a family a lot of us grew up with and to see the obvious affection that Ted has for those kids.

~~John Cronin~~

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/national/politics/2008/view.bg?articleid=1115253&srvc=rss

DENVER - Former Bay State Gov. Mitt Romney descended on Denver today but said he has no news on if he’ll be John McCain’s vice presidential pick.

“We’re just here to talk about the issues,” Romney told the Herald, adding he’s heard nothing on the VP front.

Speculation has been rampant in recent days that Romney will be McCain’s choice for running mate. McCain is expected to make his announcement Thursday.

Romney also praised Sen. Edward M. Kennedy calling him “a class act” for making a surprise appearance at the Democratic National Convention last night.

“I was very moved by Sen. Kennedy and his effort to come here. It was a powerful thing to do,” Romney said.

Share on Facebook

Tags:

Profile Image of David Kim
David Kim

Even NPR touting Romney Veep potential?

July 21st, 2008 | 4 Comments | Posted in Mitt Romney, Mitt Romney, VP, VP Prospects

Ambivalent is how I feel about NPR publishing a story touting Romney for Veep. Nonetheless, there does seem to be a critical mass of press about Romney’s Veep potential this last week or two, doesn’t there? Some key quotes:

Romney’s polish as a stand-in, combined with his business success and reassuring demeanor, look better and better as the economic issue ascends. Romney could help out in Michigan, where his name still works. He would also be at least some help in his other home regions of New England and the Mountain West.

Romney was also the guy who would have won in Iowa without the presence of evangelical preacher Mike Huckabee. Romney, who beat McCain soundly in Michigan, surely would have done so again in South Carolina and Florida if he had not been splitting the conservative vote in those states four ways with Huckabee, Fred Thompson and Rudy Giuliani.

Wow, that’s quite an endorsement from an MSM stalwart like NPR. I totally agree with the sentiment but…it’s NPR!

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Nate Gunderson
Nate Gunderson

Vote for Mitt in the VP Madness Poll

May 12th, 2008 | 53 Comments | Posted in Republicans, VP, VP Prospects, Vice President

Sorry folks for the long absence folks, but I am only temporarily back from the dead. My life got many times more hectic about the same time Romney dropped from the race. I’m still reading all the news but am no longer able to report it.

I did want to draw your attention to a certain poll that Hector from Romney Veep Watch has been pushing for a while now. The poll is sort of a play-off format between possible VP candidates. Right now it’s in the second round (out of 5) and Romney is currently losing to Mark Sanford, 55-45.

Voting closes today, so head on over to CQ Politics and vote for Romney in their VP Madness Poll.

If Romney wins, next up is Romney vs. Huckabee.

~Nate Gunderson

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of John Cronin
John Cronin

Mitt For VP Website

April 24th, 2008 | 14 Comments | Posted in VP Prospects, Vice President

My apologies if this is old news. HT to Ron for the link to the site.

~~John Cronin~~

http://www.mittforveep.com/

Howard, Glenwood MD - WE need a person with his economic training and experience…
Andrew, Franklin IN - A true American with the proven record to help this country…

John, Columbia MD - There is no one more qualified to help lead our country in a time of economic uncertainty…

Mark, Ellicott City MD - I would love to see Mitt on the ticket. He really spoke to the conservative issues…

John, Athens GA - Mitt will bring the conservatives with him!!

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of David Kim
David Kim

Mitt not even on the short list?

Even after the guy drops out, the MSM still working overtime to keep him down. McClatchy spells out their list, six deep, and Mitt is nowhere to be seen. Here’s their list:

…here’s a set of names, with the pros and cons of each person most often mentioned by Republicans:

HALEY BARBOUR, 60, governor of Mississippi

Pro: Popular former national party chairman helped Republicans win Congress in 1994 and got very good reviews for his leadership when Hurricane Katrina struck his state in 2005.

Con: A long record as a Washington lobbyist that could clash with McCain’s reform message.

CHARLIE CRIST, 51, governor of Florida

Pro: He’s a popular governor whose endorsement helped McCain win the critical Florida primary. As running mate, he’d probably help put this big swing state solidly in the Republican column.

Con: His refusal to back an anti-gay marriage initiative and appointment of Democrats to head state agencies tar him as suspect to the party base.

MIKE HUCKABEE, 52, former governor of Arkansas

Pro: He’s shown his ability to win in the South and has support among evangelical Christians. A solid social conservative.

Con: He raised taxes as governor and supported equal benefits for the Arkansas children of illegal immigrants. Picking him might not excite conservatives.

KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, 64, senator from Texas

Pro: Offers a gender balance to the ticket and wins handily in her mega-state.

Con: Support for financing embryonic stem-cell research worries social conservatives. Also, she’s probably more interested in running for governor.

CONDOLEEZZA RICE, 53, secretary of state

Pro: First black woman on the ticket provides racial and gender balance against a Democratic ticket sure to have either a black or a woman.

Con: Nobody knows what she thinks about hot-button issues from abortion to taxes. Also, her record on Iraq and other security issues could provide a running debate with her own running mate, who criticized many of those stands.

MARK SANFORD, 47, governor of South Carolina

Pro: Young, vibrant conservative with a record of fighting spending while in the House, a McCain theme.

Con: Wouldn’t add a state to the McCain column. McCain should carry South Carolina without him.

Now, I’m completely undecided as to whether a Veep spot is really good for Mitt anyway, but I have a hard time believing that Mitt is not even on the top 6 list above some of these other people.

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of John Cronin
John Cronin

McCain Train Wreck Update

February 10th, 2008 | 34 Comments | Posted in Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Ohio, VP Prospects

First, the guy who wants to be the Republican nominee loses the CPAC straw poll to the only full spectrum conservative in the campaign, Mitt Romney, and then the rumors start to bubble up that “political operatives” close to Pres. Bush are floating the name of ex-Rep. Rob Portman of Ohio as a possible VP running mate for John “Open Borders” McCain.

My understanding is that Mr. Portman has a 89% rating from the American Conservative Union, which is a good thing. However, I have only the vaguest memories of hearing his name once or twice, some time ago, and couldn’t tell you anything about his political career or his policy stances, which is a bad thing. I don’t mean to be disrespectful of Mr. Portman, my only point is that if I have almost no knowledge of him and my guess is that most of the voters will have about the same amount of name recognition as I do (or less). That being the case, what possible strengths can Mr. Portman bring to this ticket?

If Sen. McCain picks anybody but a household name for his VP, then it’s getting to the point where I’ll have to stick my fingers in my ears, because the sound of the crash when his train collides with Hillary’s/Obama’s train is going to be deafening.

~~John Cronin~~

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of David Kim
David Kim

Confirmation that a vote for Huck is a vote for Rudy

I can understand Rudy’s attraction to Huck since Rudy’s primary loyalty is to himself (as opposed to being committed to his pro-abortion views). Huck’s attraction to Rudy, however, is hard to explain. Why would someone who is allegedly committed to social conservatism want to help an unmitigated disaster for values issues in the GOP get the party’s nomination?

One positive way to interpret it would be that perhaps Huckabee thinks that he could use his position as VP to make sure that values issues don’t get too left off the agenda in a Giuliani administration.

Or, maybe it’s just good old fashioned cynical ambition. Huck believes that Rudy’s going to get it, so might as well hitch his wagon to that horse regardless of the damage it will do to values issues.

Either way, here’s confirmation from the Telegraph:

Giuliani and Huckabee agree to pull punches
By Philip Sherwell in New York and Tim Shipman in Washington
Last Updated: 12:04am GMT 02/12/2007

Rudolph Giuliani, the Republican frontrunner, and Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor now surging up the party’s rankings, are pursuing an unofficial non-aggression pact as they try to knock rivals out of the race for the presidential nomination.

In the week that the battle for the Republican nomination turned ugly in a bad-tempered televised debate, the former New York mayor and the ex-Arkansas governor have been at pains not to knock each other, according to campaign insiders.

Advisors to Mr Giuliani told The Sunday Telegraph that they were deliberately refraining from public criticism of Mr Huckabee, despite his increasing popularity, in the hope that he can derail their mutual rivals, Mitt Romney and Fred Thompson.

Mr Huckabee, a folksy Baptist minister who is drawing support from the party’s evangelical base, has also gone out of his way to be polite about Mr Giuliani, even though his views on abortion, gun control and gay rights are anathema to Mr Huckabee’s religious supporters.

By contrast, Mr Huckabee has come under increasing fire from Mr Romney for allegedly being soft on illegal immigrants and from Mr Thompson for raising taxes during his 10 years in the Little Rock governor’s mansion.

The peculiarities of the US presidential nomination system explain the importance of the undeclared accord between Mr Giuliani and Huckabee, who have been mentioned as possible running mates on the Republican presidential ticket.

Although Mr Giuliani leads his party’s national polls, he is not expecting to win the early primary-caucus states starting with Iowa on Jan 3. His strategy is based on reasonable finishes in the first votes, then winning Florida in late January before sweeping the board on so-called “Super Duper Tuesday” on Feb 5 when more than 20 states vote, including his major powerbases of New York and California.

His strongest rival for the nomination appears to be Mr Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, who has enjoyed long-time leads in the first two states to vote, Iowa and New Hampshire, which traditionally set the tone for the rest of the primary season.

But Mr Huckabee is now running neck-and-neck with the much-better funded Romney campaign in Iowa. If he scores a surprise triumph there, then Mr Giuliani’s bitterest foe - the two men exchanged angry words in Tuesday’s debate - could struggle to recover.

However, some Giuliani supporters are concerned that pulling their punches on Mr Huckabee could allow him to build up enough momentum to become a threat to their own candidate’s stuttering campaign. Although he has no serious support in New Hampshire, he could use a strong showing in Iowa as the springboard for victory in South Carolina, the gateway to the South where his Baptist credentials will serve him well. And recent polls have also shown him on the rise in Florida - the keystone of the Giuliani strategy.

Former Giuliani speechwriter Fred Siegel told The Sunday Telegraph: “Right now, Huckabee is an unmitigated Godsend for Rudy. They have a shared interest in not attacking each other right now, but if Huckabee threatens to upset the apple cart in Florida, then the gloves will be off for the Giuliani campaign. Florida is his firewall.”

A senior Giuliani campaign adviser said: “Huckabee’s strong showing in Iowa has proved helpful to us. He is a very persuasive campaigner and it’s no secret that a lot of people would like him on the shortlist for vice president if Rudy wins the nomination.

“He is a very good campaigner and in many ways he would be a good fit for Rudy - he plays well in states where we would otherwise not be strong.

“But the campaign is watching carefully because if he wins Iowa he could turn that into enough momentum to take South Carolina. Then he might be a threat.”

However, Republican strategist Mike Murphy warned that it might be too late to kill off the Huckabee bandwagon - a problem for Mr Romney now, but potentially for Mr Giuliani later. He said: “Huckabee has got that vote that’s always there waiting for somebody, that 25 to 30 percent of the Republican caucus that’s Christian fundamentalist and, and is a strong vote and they like him. Huckabee will be hard to move down off that number.”

Mr Giuliani’s presidential bid suffered a fresh blow last week after claims that as New York mayor, he billed obscure city agencies for tens of thousands of dollars in security expenses for trips to a Long Island town where Judith Nathan, his mistress at the time and now his third wife, had an apartment.

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Vic Lundquist
Vic Lundquist

President Romney + Whom for Vice President?

November 21st, 2007 | 3 Comments | Posted in Mitt Romney, Netroots, Open Blog, VP Prospects

Over at DRY FLY POLITICS, they have an open blog to list out your “Ideal Ticket for 2008″. Many people are simply listing their choice for President and VP. My suggestion is that in addition to giving them two names, that we give them some good reasons why President Romney is the best choice, etc. As I post this note, there are 18 comments listed.

Click here to leave your choice ——> OPEN THREAD: What is your ideal ticket for 2008?

Remember, place your comments at the Dry Fly Politics site, not on this post.

~ Vic

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of David Kim
David Kim

Romney/Petraeus 2008!

October 28th, 2007 | 9 Comments | Posted in 2008, Jim Geraghty, Mitt Romney, VP Prospects

Wow, wouldn’t that be a great combination? William Safire predicted it on Meet the Press today. Jim Geraghty over at National Review is skeptical (as am I…I think I’d rather have General Petraeus getting the bad guys in Iraq than stumping across the country).

“For Mitt Romney’s running mate, Safire predicted Gen. David Petraeus. If progress continues in Iraq, I could see Petraeus becoming an Eisenhower-like (or at least Schwartzkpf-like, or Powell-like) figure in American politics. But I don’t think he’ll be on a ticket in 2008.”

Still, would be pretty cool, yes?

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Nate Gunderson
Nate Gunderson

Weekly Poll #9 - VP Guessing Game

August 14th, 2007 | 8 Comments | Posted in 2008, Mitt Romney, VP Prospects

I am keenly aware that it is too early for the campaign to be considering possible candidates for the VP spot. This poll is purely for speculative enjoyment. I gathered all the names that were suggested (except for Arnold for his ineligibility) that were given in the comments for an earlier post. All I can gather from the names and the comments is that the field is wide open, and should the Governor obtain the nomination, he will have an extremely difficult decision ahead of him. You will be able to select three people, though you need not use all three of your votes.

I also struggled with how I should word the question for the poll. Should it be ‘Who do you think Romney would pick?’, ‘Who do you want him to pick?’, and settled on the following: (note the word should..)

[poll=9]

I haven’t even voted yet because I will still have to do some more consideration. No clear answer in my mind.

BTW-The results for last week’s poll: “Which candidate would you most like to drop out?’ can be found here. Brownback was the clear loser with at least 75% of this site’s readers selecting him as one of the candidates they would most like to drop out. Huckabee the clear winner at 9%. Is there any surprise? That poll had our highest turnout so far in terms of number of votes cast.

~Nate Gunderson

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Ann Marie Curling
Ann Marie Curling

Another person to consider for VP

I mentioned this in the comments section of “Open Blog Monday”, but I wanted to highlight this in it’s own post.

As you all know my #1 choice for VP is JEB. But, if Jeb won’t run. I’d like to tell you a little bit about a former Governor of the State of Michigan. His name is John Engler, and if you read his bio from The National Association of Manufactures you’ll see that Governor Romney & Governor Engler would be a perfect team.

John Engler

Here is how closely aligned Governor Engler & Governor Romney’s views are:

Governor Engler:

During his tenure at the NAM, Engler has emerged as one of the nations top advocates for developing the nations abundant domestic energy supplies to meet the needs of a growing economy. The NAM helped create the Consumer Alliance for Energy Security to promote exploration and development of natural gas and oil resources in the Outer Continental Shelf, and Engler is a strong supporter of expanding renewable energy and clean-coal technology and revitalizing Americas nuclear power industry.

Governor Romney:

We must become independent from foreign sources of oil. This will mean a combination of efforts related to conservation and efficiency measures, developing alternative sources of energy like biodiesel, ethanol, nuclear, and coal gasification, and finding more domestic sources of oil such as in ANWR or the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS).

Governor Engler:

Engler also focuses on competitiveness through innovation, emphasizing research and development, implementation of information technologyincluding in the area of health careintellectual property rights, visas for skilled foreign workers, and education and training. In line with these goals, the NAM chairs the Compete America Coalition, representing more than 200 corporations, universities, research institutions and trade associations.

Governor Romney:

China and the rest of Asia are on the move economically and technologically. They are a family oriented, educated, hard-working, and mercantile people. We must be ready and able to compete. This means ensuring our children are educated to compete in this new market, our trade laws are fair and balanced, and our economy and tax laws welcome new investment. If America acts boldly and swiftly, the emergence of Asia will be an opportunity. Trade and commerce with these huge new economies can further strengthen our economy and propel our growth. If America fails to act, we will be eclipsed.

Our national investment in technology comes from both the private and public sector; however corporations today spend more on tort liability than they do on R&D. While the government already invests heavily in defense, space and health technologies, it is time to invest substantially in technologies related to power generation, nanotechnology, and materials science.

The health of our nation can be improved by extending health insurance to all Americans, not through a government program or new taxes, but through market reforms.

Immigration has been an important part of our nation’s success. The current system, however, puts up a concrete wall to the best and brightest, yet those without skill or education are able to walk across the border. We must reform the current immigration laws so we can secure our borders, implement a mandatory biometrically enabled, tamper proof documentation and employment verification system, and increase legal immigration into America.

Governor Engler:

As Governor, Engler signed 32 tax cuts into lawsaving Michigan taxpayers some $32 billionand helped create more than 800,000 new jobs during his tenure, taking Michigans unemployment rate to a record low. The top priority of Englers administration was improving education, with a focus on high standards, equity and accountability.

Governor Romney:

America’s tax code is a labyrinth that imposes an enormous and unnecessary burden on our citizens and employers. Keeping taxes low and simplifying the code will grow the economy and enhance our competitiveness.

Today’s schools are falling further and further behind world standards. It is time to raise the bar on education by making teaching a true profession, measuring progress, providing a focus on math and science, and involving parents from the beginning of a child’s school career.

In the end he was turned out of office (after a 3rd term), primarily because he was just too conservative for the electorate. He was a champion of welfare reform, not to aforementioned tax cuts.

[CORRECTION FROM READER DAVID: Governor Engler was term limited out of office I just remember him being pretty unpopular at the end of his term, but I thank David for pointing out my error]

We all can see what kind of a mess Michigan is in now, as a result of the current Democratic leadership in Ms. Granholm. Too bad Governor Engler couldn’t have been elected again, the state might not be in the mess that it is in now.

Engler info taken from:

[http://www.nam.org/s_nam/doc1.asp?CID=202103&DID=232083]

Romney info taken from

[http://www.mittromney.com/Issue-Watch/index]

Ann Marie

Share on Facebook


[ Copy this | Start New | Full Size ]