Browse > Home / Archive by category 'Regional / International'

| Subcribe via RSS

***Ads Do Not Necessarily Represent The Opinions of the Staff of comMITTed to Romney***

***Support comMITTed to Romney by visiting our sponsors***

Profile Image of John Cronin
John Cronin

Only One Choice in Face of Nuclear Terror

June 8th, 2008 | 12 Comments | Posted in Barack Obama, IBD Editorial, Iraq, Israel, John McCain, War

I just came across this brief editorial by one of my favorite writers, the immensely talented Dr. Thomas Sowell. What he had to say was grim…….and timely. If you have been following the fighting between Israel and Iranian-backed Hezbollah, you know that Iran has no scruples about giving missiles and other armaments to people who use them against innocent civilians. We also know that our military personnel in Iraq are being killed and maimed by IED’s provided by Iran.

So, it should come as no surprise that the Mullahs of Iran will with hold no good thing in their soon to be developed nuclear arsenal from terrorists bent on destroying first Israel and then the United States of America.

Please take the time to read this article so that you will have this information as you prepare to cast your vote in the Presidential elections.

~~John Cronin~~

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=297558971216461

By: Dr. Thomas Sowell

Our one window of opportunity to prevent this will occur within the term of whoever becomes president of the United States in 2009.

At a time like this, we don’t have the luxury of waiting for our ideal candidate or of indulging our emotions by voting for a third party candidate to show our displeasure — at the cost of putting someone in the White House who isn’t up to the job.

Sen. John McCain has been criticized in this column many times. But, when all is said and done, he has not spent decades aiding and abetting people who hate America.

On the contrary, he has paid a huge price for resisting our enemies, even when they held him prisoner and tortured him. The choice between him and Barack Obama should be a no-brainer.

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of John Cronin
John Cronin

Surge To Victory

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=296780190323947

Surge To Victory

By INVESTOR’S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Tuesday, May 27, 2008 4:20 PM PT

War On Terror: They said the surge would fail. They claimed we had no allies. They called Iraq a quagmire. They sought to cut and run. Now, our victories over terror are accelerating across the world.

I love this quote from the end of the article: IT’S A BAD TIME TO BE A TERRORIST.

~~John Cronin~~

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of John Cronin
John Cronin

Congressman Mike Pence’s Speech In Recognition Of Israel’s 60th Anniversary

April 27th, 2008 | 1 Comment | Posted in Israel, Mike Pence, Mitt Romney

Rep. Mike Pence continues to impress me with his conservatism and his thoughtful approach to the challenges that face us. I wanted to make his speech available to our readers because I think it is vitally important to continue to support one of the few friends we have in the Middle East.

IMHO, we owe a debt of gratitude to the courageous State Of Israel for their willingness to take military action against the attempts by both Iraq under Saddam Hussein and more recently, Syria, to go nuclear. They have used air strikes twice to take out nuclear facilities that would have been used against them and would have also placed our personnel in Israel in harm’s way.

As many of you know, the modern State of Israel was reborn on May 14, 1948 after 2,500 years of the Diaspora. I think this is one of the most fascinating stories I have ever seen. If you haven’t done any research on this subject, I highly recommend that you do and you will definitely enjoy the process.

~~John Cronin~~

“Pray for the peace of Jerusalem: they shall prosper that love thee.”

Psalm 122 vs. 6

http://mikepence.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=89322

Washington, Apr 22 -
Congressman Mike Pence, the Ranking Member of the Middle East and South Asia Subcommittee of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, gave the following speech from the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives today, in recognition of Israel’s 60th anniversary:

“Mr. Speaker, sixty years ago next month, the state of Israel, under the leadership of a small band of courageous Zionists, declared independence in its ancient homeland.
“It was promptly recognized by the United States, as the distinguished Majority Leader just eloquently described. And, it was promptly attacked by its Arab neighbors.

“The more things change, the more they seem to stay the same.

“Israel prevailed against long odds then and we celebrate sixty years of that on the floor today, and will celebrate around the United States and around the world next month. It was against extraordinarily long odds it prevailed again in 1967, 1973, and on countless other times since.
“It is important that we note that through these trials and travails, Israel remains the only fully functioning democracy in the Middle East.

“Founded by Holocaust survivors and resolved to overcome the horrors of mid-Twentieth Century Europe’s atrocities, today Israel boasts a vibrant economy with a well-educated populace. Israel’s GDP exceeded most major economies in 2007 and has reached Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development candidate status.

“Israel, sixty years on from that historic day next month, is an extraordinary success. But Israel is still in a neighborhood of sworn enemies. In its sixtieth year of history, all of two Arab countries have seen fit to recognize Israel. And, today’s leader of Iran threatens with regularity to ‘wipe Israel off the map.’

“That’s why I rise today to say two things.

“Number one, I join my colleagues in both parties who rise to congratulate this historic accomplishment of sixty years hence.
“But I also say that as we commend Israel, we in this body in both parties should look for opportunities to recommit ourselves to her defense.
“We cannot stand idly by while a gathering menace grows in the region. We cannot stand quiet while some Americans travel overseas and associate themselves with the blood-soaked enemies of Israel.

“So today we celebrate and we celebrate in a spirit of bipartisanship.

“But, I hope as this historic 60th anniversary approaches, we in this body in both parties will look for those opportunities upon which we can come together to rededicate ourselves to the preservation and the protection of Israel as a Jewish state and to Jerusalem as her eternal capital.”

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Mike Laub
Mike Laub

Obama is wrong on Iran.

February 19th, 2008 | 5 Comments | Posted in Iran, Obama

Reasons to agree

  1. Obama has said; “We have not explored any kind of dialogue with either Iran or North Korea, and I think that has been a mistake. As a consequence, we have almost no leverage over them.” (Meet the Press with Tim Russert, October 22, 2006) Again, they say Obama is smart. How exactly is talking to them going to give us more leverage, besides being able to threaten them with not talking to them anymore?
  2. You should have to meat some simple standards to be considered a legitimate government worthy of diplomatic relations. Some of these qualifications would include not calling for the destruction of Israel, denying the holocaust, funding extremist, and providing weapons that are being used against us in Iraq, teaching that Jews and Christians are pigs and dogs in your schools, denying the holocaust, and 100 other things too many to include on this list. So, no Barak, we should not re-establish relations with Iran no matter how open minded it makes you feel. There is such thing as evil, and your unwillingness to acknowledge this, and to respond correctly keeps you from being qualified as president.

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Mike Laub
Mike Laub

John Mark Reynolds” “Give ‘Em Scorpions” Politics: Avoiding Rehoboam’s Folly

John Mark Reynolds is awesome.

He recently wrote an article called “Give ‘Em Scorpions” Politics: Avoiding Rehoboam’s Folly. You need to read the whole thing. It talks about Solomon’s son Rehoboam who is largely to blame for the division between the tribe of Judah, and the rest of Israel.

Rehoboam broke the coalition between Israel and Judah, much the way the Huckabee’s campaign manager wants to break the house that Reagan built. It wasn’t enough for him to give us Bill Clinton, by running Ross Perot, but I digress.

Click here to read the whole thing.

If the old Reagan coalition is dissolved, then it will not be those who do the deed who suffer first, but millions more unborn children who might have been saved.

As I vote, and I will vote, let me vote for a person who can keep a coalition together and not break it up on its fault lines.

As I vote, pray God, let me be patient and accept slow change that the people can accept and not demand everything that will cost me everything.

As I vote, let me listen to older and wiser heads without becoming cynical and dropping out.

Let me avoid Rehoboam’s folly in the ballot box this year.

If you have no idea what he is talking about, read this article!

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Mike Laub
Mike Laub

Romney in South Carolina

January 10th, 2008 | 17 Comments | Posted in 2008, Debate, Iran, Mitt Romney, economy

Gov. Romney: Fighting For Jobs In Michigan

Gov. Romney: No Special Pathway

Gov. Romney: Bringing Change To Washington

Gov. Romney: Advancing Moderate Voices In The Muslim World

Gov. Romney: Strengthening The Economy

Gov. Romney: Knowing How America Works

Gov. Romney: A Comprehensive Iran Strategy

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Jeff Fuller
Jeff Fuller

As Recession Looms, Who’s Best for Economy? Barron’s Online Say Romney

Yesterday, I reviewed how the Economy is a vital issue for both Repubs and Dems–also pointing out there is increasing concern of a looming recession and how McCain’s not quite up to snuff on this issue (even by his own admission)

But who would be best for the economy? Barron’s Online back in July said that Romney would be the best GOP candidate and McCain the worst GOP candidate for the economy (Huck’s lucky that he wasn’t included in their rankings back then). Their cover story article was called “The Mitt and Bill Show” Parts One and Two.

Some notable quotes:

Romney would be the best Republican candidate for stocks, bonds and the economy

“Based on our report card, the optimal match-up for Wall Street would be Richardson versus Romney, because both candidates favor low taxes and sound fiscal policy.”

“Romney, formerly governor of Massachusetts and once a top private-equity investor, garnered 3.8 points out of a possible 4″

“Polls show that most Americans consider estate taxes to be unjust. Nevertheless, Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani are the only candidates who favor total elimination. Romney told us, “I believe that it is unfair to tax income when it is earned, then again when it is saved and then again when it is passed on to one’s children and grandchildren.”

. . .

McCain’s answer was ambiguous. On one hand, he supported extending all Bush tax cuts. But then he said the estate tax should be “low, simple, predictable and unobtrusive.”

Folks, if the Economy takes a turn south we need a nominee who can make a convincing case that he can help turn it around. Only Romney can make that sale IMO (his resume is quite impressive in his education on ecomomics). As far as who I’d trust to with the Economy Romney’s first, Rudy’s a distant second, then Fred, then McCain, then Richardson, then Clinton tied with Huckabee, then Obama, then Edwards. We should keep in mind that there’s a far greater chance of a economic downturn than many other variables or possibilities that people talk about a POTUS may face.

Jeff Fuller

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Ann Marie Curling
Ann Marie Curling

Dole Rubukes Huckabee

They keep piling on against the Huck, criticisms that is…This time from famed Veteran and former Senator from Kansas Bob Dole…

His letter to Huckabee:

Bob Dole
“Dear Governor,

“I’m puzzled by your gratuitous slaps at the President in the January/February issue of Foreign Affairs. By the way, I have no special ties to President Bush and I’m not involved in any presidential campaign.

“Why have you joined the “Bush bashers?” I know Iowans fairly well and doubt those attending Republican caucuses will appreciate your critical comments. President Bush gets more than his fair share of criticism from the other side and many in the “mainstream” media. They all really must be heartened by your comments.

“As a veteran, I worry about the future security of the good people of Iowa and all other Americans. We are engaged in a global war on terror which will not disappear because you imply a willingness, without any preconditions apparently, to sit down with the enemy. Sure we can all find fault with President Bush and his Administration on policy matters and phases of the Iraq policy. I doubt however Iowans will applaud second guessing more than five years after the agony of 9-11, particularly since you have been either silent or supportive during the interim as far as I can determine.

“The Foreign Affairs piece is a perfect example of 20-20 hindsight, and wishful thinking in most instances. You make knotty foreign policy issues sound so easy if we would just change our ways. I never was a foreign policy expert though I followed it closely for nearly three decades under Democrat and Republican Presidents.

“The great majority of Americans regardless of party, place liberty, freedom and security as top priorities. I’m certain you do too but I am troubled about some of the statements attributed to you in the Foreign Affairs article.

“The administration is certainly not perfect, I cannot recall one, but I do not believe it should be your primary foreign policy target. We are a great, compassionate nation and I know you want to keep it so.

“To win in 2008 we need to multiply, not divide,” Dole said.

He then joked in a post-script: “P.S. I lost the General in ‘96, so what do I know?”

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Ann Marie Curling
Ann Marie Curling

Huck Gets Positive Press Attention in Iran…

Click Here —–>Top Republican Candidate Wants Dialog with Iran.

 

 (I hope you don’t mind the addition, Rusty)

Not exactly the kind of attention one would want as they’re running for President.

But he was critical of the Bush foreign policy, which he described as “arrogant bunker mentality.”

In the Iranian context, his policy is being interpreted as a change, calling for bringing to the table non-military options as well. Huckabee is of the opinion that relations with Iran deteriorated following Bush’s “axis of evil” speech. In many points his message on Iran is more akin to that of the Democrats: there is a need for dialogue with Iran, and more diplomacy is needed. He quoted the Chinese strategist Sun Tzu, who authored The Art of War 2,500 years ago: “Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.”

To the Dear Voters of Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, Michigan, and Florida,

Do you really want for your President someone who Iran looks to positively? As you caucus and vote in the primaries in the next days and weeks, please keep this in mind!

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Ann Marie Curling
Ann Marie Curling

Huck Knows More About Jamie Lynn Spears than he does the NIE Report

December 20th, 2007 | 2 Comments | Posted in Culture, Iran, Mitt Romney

As this —–>Post from SLOG states, Mr. Huckabee sure does seem to know quite a bit about Jamie Lynn Spears, it’s too bad that he doesn’t have as much care and concern about International Relations. Maybe if he spent less time reading about her, he might know more about him.

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Ann Marie Curling
Ann Marie Curling

Huck Touts Open Relations With Iran



Share on Facebook

Profile Image of John Cronin
John Cronin

Today’s Republicans Might Not Elect Reagan

This article is so good, I thought I’d take the liberty of posting it in it’s entirety.

The message, IMHO, is for anyone considering “staying home” or “going third party” because of the MSM generated angst over the lack of a “real conservative like Reagan” that social conservatives can rally around.

McClatchy Washington Bureau ^ | November 30, 2007 | Steven Thomma

Posted on 12/02/2007 9:28:01 AM PST by Graybeard58

WASHINGTON — They want to put his face on Mount Rushmore, but Republicans today are demanding such ideological purity that they might not even nominate Ronald Reagan for president if he were to run now.

Abortion? He was for abortion rights before he was against them.

Taxes? He raised them as governor, and raised them several times as president after his big 1981 tax cuts.

Immigration? He signed the law that Republicans now call amnesty for illegals.

Foreign policy? He negotiated with the head of the “Evil Empire.”
In fact, they’d find him wrong on almost every hot-button issue of the 2008 campaign.

Most of those stands are overlooked in the Republicans’ idealized rear-view idolization of Reagan as an unwavering conservative icon. But they serve as a reminder that even the revered Reagan was a pragmatic politician whose stands often changed and might not fit in today’s politics.

The real Reagan story is forgotten as Republicans this year attack one another for past offenses even if they’ve moved toward conservative orthodoxy since. They criticize Mitt Romney for once supporting abortion rights, though he now opposes them. They tear into Mike Huckabee for raising some taxes as governor, ignoring his vow not to raise them as president. They rip Rudy Giuliani for once welcoming illegal immigrants to New York, though he takes a hard line now.

Through it all, they ignore the real Reagan.

“Their memories of Reagan are very selective,” said Steven Schier, a political scientist at Carleton College in Minnesota. “In some ways, they’re creating a standard that is not real, that did not happen, and holding each other to that standard. I don’t think Reagan himself would do well in this environment.”

Take abortion.

Romney is routinely criticized as a flip-flopper for changing from a supporter of abortion rights to an opponent while governor of Massachusetts. But regardless of whether his switch was born of principle or political expedience, he did change to the position that most Republican profess to want.

His defense is simple. He changed his mind, he says, “just like Ronald Reagan did.”

He’s right, to a degree.

As the governor of California, Reagan signed a 1967 law that allowed abortions in the state six years before the Supreme Court legalized them nationwide.

Author and Reagan biographer Lou Cannon noted that Reagan made that decision in a vastly different time, before the issue had become such an emotional flash point.

“Reagan had never considered the issue,” Cannon said.
The party was more libertarian in philosophy then, and a top Republican in the state Senate predicted that the bill would put the issue behind them, so Reagan signed it. He changed his mind later, and told Cannon he wouldn’t have signed the bill a year later.

“Hell, all these people change positions,” Cannon said, “and legitimately so.”

Or consider taxes.

Huckabee’s rivals and the anti-tax group Club for Growth are attacking him for raising taxes while he was the governor of Arkansas. Yet he’s promised not to raise taxes as president, and cites Reagan as proof that a politician can change.

“If Reagan were running today,” Huckabee said this week, “the Club for Growth would be running ads against him because he raised taxes by a billion when he was governor of California.”
Indeed, Reagan did sign a billion-dollar tax increase while he was governor in 1967. As president, he also signed several tax increases that offset some of his historic 1981 cut in federal income taxes.

Consider illegal immigration.

Giuliani and Romney snipe at each other over their records on this issue, accusing each other of offering “sanctuary” to illegal immigrants in New York City and Massachusetts.

Yet Reagan effectively turned the United States into a sanctuary when he signed the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, which gave amnesty to illegals who were already here.

There were other times as well when Reagan took positions that would draw attacks in today’s Republican presidential campaign.
Never withdraw troops? He pulled them out of Lebanon in 1984 after a suicide bomber killed 241 U.S. Marines.

Talk to our enemies? He personally negotiated and signed deals with a Soviet regime that he himself called the Evil Empire.
Curiously, he was able to thrive in his time in part because he hadn’t yet unified the modern Republican Party in his conservative image.

He named Sandra Day O’Connor to the Supreme Court, for example, and she later became the swing vote in upholding the right to abortion. He probably couldn’t get away with that appointment today, just as President George W. Bush was forced to withdraw his nomination of Harriet Miers because he couldn’t assure conservatives that she’d oppose abortion from the bench.
For now, much of the sniping over today’s candidates’ records reflects a close, wide-open race in which all of those running are desperate to prove their conservative credentials and to discredit their rivals.

Ultimately, said Grover Norquist, a conservative strategist and Reagan devotee, the Republicans should learn to look forward rather than back, and welcome those who move to the right.
“I am not a critic of those who say they once did a bad thing and are not going to do that anymore,” Norquist said in an interview. “A successful political movement accepts converts. The Catholic Church doesn’t say, ‘If you weren’t with us 10 years ago, you can’t be with us now.’ I am very much in favor of accepting converts.”

~~John Cronin~~

“Come on now, all you young men, all over the world…….Enter upon your inheritance, accept your responsibilities. Raise the glorious flags again, advance them upon the new enemies, who constantly gather upon the front of the human army, and have only to be assaulted to be overthrown. Don’t take no for an answer, never submit to failure. Do not be fobbed off with mere personal success or acceptance. You will make all kinds of mistakes; but as long as you are generous and true, and also fierce, you can not hurt the world or even seriously distress her. She was made to be wooed and won by youth.”

Winston Churchill “While England Slept” published in 1936

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Ann Marie Curling
Ann Marie Curling

Blast from the past, three old posts on Romney worth a second look…

This site is so huge, as is our database of posts and comments that it’s very easy to overlook older posts that mean something even today.

I’ve dug out three of those such posts, and am giving them a second look.

Lessons of the Father - This one’s a great post, goes over Romney’s life time line and discusses the influence his father has had and continues to have on him.
Romney pledges salary to charity if elected president - I’m not sure how many of you are aware of this, but as the post says Governor Romney will be donating his entire salary as President to charity.
EXCERPTS FROM GOVERNOR MITT ROMNEY’S REMARKS AT THE SEVENTH ANNUAL HERZLIYA CONFERENCE - An excellent speech given in Israel.

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Vic Lundquist
Vic Lundquist

Cunning Warmth

September 23rd, 2007 | No Comments | Posted in Cartoons, Foreign Affairs, Humor, Iran, Mitt Romney, Radical Islam


Artwork by Michael Ramirez —– Courtesy of IBD Editorials

~ Vic

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Ann Marie Curling
Ann Marie Curling

OUTRAGE

September 23rd, 2007 | 1 Comment | Posted in 2008, Iran, Mitt Romney, National Security


This pretty much tells it like it is for me.

Click the Iran category link in this message for all the reasons why, this picture’s pretty self explanatory though.

Oh, and I’d like to see everyone boycott Columbia University to the degree that they’d have to close up shop forever for agreeing to let this piece of pond scum speak at their school.

Thank Goodness we have a man in Mitt Romney who would stand up to this man, and not let this idly pass him by if he were President.

Share on Facebook


[ Copy this | Start New | Full Size ]