Browse > Home / Archive by category 'LDS'

| Subcribe via RSS

Profile Image of John Cronin
John Cronin

GAYS, MORMONS CLASH AT SECOND ‘KISS-IN’ AT MORMON PLAZA

July 20th, 2009 | 10 Comments | Posted in Fox News, Gay Rights, LDS, Mormon, Mormons

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,533900,00.html?test=latestnews

SALT LAKE CITY — A mass-kissing protest near the Mormon church temple Sunday drew a shouting match between gay activists and their critics.

For the second consecutive weekend, about 100 people gathered to stage a “kiss-in” to protest the treatment of two gay men cited for trespassing July 9 after they shared a kiss on the plaza owned by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Both gay and straight couples exchanged kisses during the protest.

Demonstrators were greeted at the south entrance by a group of protesters carrying large signs that denounced homosexuality, prompting a heated verbal exchange.

Police say no one was arrested or cited, despite a large group exchanging kisses by a reflecting pool at the plaza’s center.

“We didn’t call the police. We didn’t do anything,” church spokeswoman Kim Farah said.

The church bought one block of Salt Lake City’s Main Street to build a plaza in the 1990s alongside the Temple, where Mormon marriages and other religious rituals take place.

Matt Aune has said he and his partner, Derek Jones, exchanged a modest kiss at the plaza 11 days ago, but church officials contend their behavior was lewd.

“There was much more involved that a simple kiss of the cheek,” Farah said in a statement Friday.

“They engaged in passionate kissing, groping, profane and lewd language, and had obviously been using alcohol.”

The men have said they were walking home from a nearby concert and cutting through the plaza on their way home.

A police report said they sat down for a kiss and were approached by a pair of church security guards, who asked them to leave because their behavior was “unwanted.”

Both were handcuffed and Aune was pinned to the ground.

Share on Facebook

Tags: ,

Profile Image of John Cronin
John Cronin

LDS blog chooses Romney as 2008 Mormon of the Year

January 7th, 2009 | 3 Comments | Posted in LDS, Mitt Romney, Mormon, Mormons

http://www.sltrib.com/News/ci_11394235

By Peggy Fletcher Stack

The Salt Lake Tribune

Despite a strong campaign by supporters of Mormon blogger Stephanie Nielson and fans of singing sensation David Archuleta, the staff of Times and Seasons (http://www.timesandseasons.org) has selected Mitt Romney as 2008 Mormon of the Year.

“During 2008, Romney concluded the most credible presidential campaign of any Mormon to date and dominated the U.S. national news early in the year like no single Mormon has in recent memory,” organizer Kent S. Larsen said in an e-mail Wednesday. “He garnered a great deal of both praise and criticism, gaining him significant endorsements as well as important detractors. . .On the international scene, numerous press articles mentioned Romney’s membership in the Mormon Church, thus contributing to the image of the church abroad.”

The Mormon of the Year designation is a recognition of the effect the person or group of persons has had during the past year and “should not be seen as an endorsement [Romney's] political positions or aspirations,” Larsen added.

Last week, Larsen first nominated five well-known members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints for the honor: Romney, Archuleta, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Mormon novelist Stephenie Meyer, and JetBlue founder David Neeleman. He excluded the LDS Church’s First Presidency (including the prophet) and Quorum of the Twelve Apostles because their overwhelming influence would guarantee their selection every year.

Larsen then invited the public to make other suggestions, which he compiled into a lengthy list and asked readers to vote on their favorites.

Several named Nielson, a Mesa, Ariz., Mormon, whose writing about motherhood had attracted a large online following. In August, a small airplane carrying Nielson and her husband, Christian, crashed, leaving the couple with burns covering nearly 30 percent of their bodies. Nielson’s sister, Courtney Kendrick, has continued to update Nielsen’s blog, nieniedialogues.blogspot.com, as well as organizing online auctions and inspirational messages for her sister.

“The site, a diary of home life that [Nielson] started in 2005 for close friends and family, had attracted a small but ardent following, thanks to its upbeat dispatches about marriage, home décor, entertaining and the art of raising four children ages 6 and younger,” Alex Williams wrote in the New York Times on Sept. 6. “To her admirers, she was Supermom.”

After the accident, readership on the site spiked from 1,000 to more than 20,000, the Times reported.

Nielson’s nomination raised the issue of what constituted Mormon of the Year. Was it fame, moral courage or being a good example of LDS values? Many argued she did more for the faith than anyone else.

“Stephanie and Courtney have changed my life,” wrote one voter known only as “SJC.” “I knew nothing about LDS before them, and now I have faces and names and morals and reasoning behind the church . . . stories about their upbringing and their community, their traditions.”

But Larsen reminded voters that “how righteous the person is or how faithful they are to the teachings of the LDS Church isn’t the point. . . [Stephanie and Courtney] obviously have a base of very loyal fans, but most of the world has never heard of them.

In the end, Times and Seasons staff went with Romney, Larsen said, because he had “the greatest impact or influence on Mormons and Mormonism in 2008.”

pstack@sltrib.com

Share on Facebook

Tags:

Profile Image of John Cronin
John Cronin

Focus On Family Pulls Glenn Beck Article

December 27th, 2008 | 22 Comments | Posted in Catholics, Glenn Beck, James Dobson, LDS, Mitt Romney, Mormons

I wanted to bring this controversy to the attention of our readers, not to promote any in depth discussion of the differences in understanding of Christian theology between the LDS Church and other Churches, but because I see a definite link between this ongoing in fighting amongst fellow conservatives and the electoral loss we just endured.

We have had a debate on the life and teachings of Jesus Christ for over 2,000 years. If past experience is any guide, it doesn’t look good for settling this anytime soon, so my suggestion is that we all respectfully agree to disagree on some points of theology, and to turn to those areas where we do agree, namely on our shared values and conservative political philosophy.

While some Evangelicals have dedicated themselves to pointing out the differences that do exist, they have had a “throw the baby out with the bath water” approach to this past election. They rejected the most full spectrum conservative, Pro Life Republican since Reagan, because of theological differences, and in doing so, they helped elect the most liberal, pro abortion President-elect ever. Wow! Do they yet realize what they have done? The so-called “Freedom of Choice Act” ( negating any law which tries to limit the scope of the abortion industry ) has already been written and awaits the signature of soon to be President Barack Obama. The “Fairness Doctrine” bill designed to silence ALL conservatives, Catholics, Protestants, Baptists and Latter Day Saints, awaits the signature of soon to be President Barack Obama. Embryonic stem cell research funding bills await his signature, too.

While the theology police were out on patrol for any deviation from doctrine, this is what they unwittingly unleashed.

I don’t mean to impugn their motives. They are passionate in their defense of dogma, but I just wish they would have realized the truth of what Romney supporters have been writing and talking about for the last two years. Mitt was running for President, not Pastor. If all of us on the right don’t take away some very hard earned and very expensive ( in terms of human life consequences ) lessons from this in fighting over theology when politics and policy should have been the focus, we are doomed to repeat the same mistakes that cost us: 1. the Presidency 2. the House 3. the Senate 4. maybe the right to filibuster toxic bills 5. maybe the Supreme Court 6. Independent voters. What a terrible price to pay for the luxury of indulging ourselves in a hissy fit.

Of course, that’s all water under the bridge now. We can, however, learn from our mistakes and resolve never to repeat the errors made in the 2008 election. We can resolve that we will follow the Constitution in 2012 where it says: “but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or Public trust under the United States.” ( Article VI )

~~John Cronin~~

http://www.mormontimes.com/mormon_voices/joel_campbell/?id=5597

James Dobson’s Focus on the Family ministry has pulled from its CitizenLink Web site an article about talk show host Glenn Beck’s book “The Christmas Sweater” after some complained that Beck’s LDS faith is a “cult” and “false religion” and shouldn’t be promoted by a Christian ministry.

When contacted Friday, a Focus on the Family worker at the ministry in Colorado Springs, Colo. confirmed that the article had been pulled at this link and read a prepared statement for callers who had called about the Beck article:

“You are correct to note that Mr. Beck is a member of the Mormon church, and that we did not make mention of this fact in our interview with him. We do recognize the deep theological difference between evangelical theology and Mormon theology, and it would have been prudent for us at least to have pointed out these differences. Because of the confusion, we have removed the interview from CitizenLink.”

All other questions about the controversy were directed to a ministry media spokesman who would not be available until Jan. 2. Calls to Beck’s offices Friday went unanswered. A link to the story still remained on the Front Page of www.glennbeck.com.

Apparently, the controversy was fueled on Dec. 22, when an anti-Mormon group called Underground Apologetics issued a release through Christian News Wire which read:

“Focus on the Family has a story on Glenn Beck, a Mormon, on their CitizenLink Web site. Glenn Beck was a CNN host and will move to Fox News in January. Beck is currently promoting his book, ‘The Christmas Sweater.’ The CitizenLink story focuses on Beck’s faith and why he wrote ‘The Christmas Sweater.’

“While Glenn’s social views are compatible with many Christian views, his beliefs in Mormonism are not. Clearly, Mormonism is a cult. The CitizenLink story does not mention Beck’s Mormon faith, however, the story makes it look as if Beck is a Christian who believes in the essential doctrines of the faith.

“Through the years, Focus on the Family has done great things to help the family and has brought attention to the many social ills that are attacking the family.

“However, to promote a Mormon as a Christian is not helpful to the cause of Jesus Christ. For Christians to influence society, Christians should be promoting the central issues of the faith properly without opening the door to false religions.”

Underground Apologetics president Steve McConkey said in an interview that he had not read Beck’s book, but understood its message. He felt that the work was suspect based on what he understands about Beck’s faith. McConkey said he had not asked Dobson’s ministry to remove the article from its site.

The Mormon Media Observer contacted Karla Dial. identified as a freelance reporter living in Colorado Springs, and received an e-mail response that said:

“I don’t think it would be appropriate for me to comment on that in any forum, but thanks for asking.”

Because the offending article is no longer available at citizenlink.org, the Mormon Media Observer is reprinting it in its entirety from an archived record. Here is also a link to an Amazon.com video about the book.

Share on Facebook

Tags: , ,

Profile Image of John Cronin
John Cronin

Gay-marriage debate roils, unites Mormons

November 25th, 2008 | 15 Comments | Posted in LDS, Mitt Romney, Mormons

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/11/24/gay_marriage_debate_roils_unites_mormons/

By Michael Paulson
Globe Staff / November 24, 2008

This has been a stormy year for Mormons in the United States. First, there was the candidacy of Mitt Romney for president, which brought to the surface a deep strain of anti-Mormonism in American culture. Then, there was the raid on a group of schismatic polygamists in Texas, which reminded America of Mormonism’s uncomfortable history. And now, there is a wave of protest, rolling across the country from west to east, in which some gay rights advocates have targeted Mormons because of their church’s support for a successful California referendum to overturn same-sex marriage.

Ironically, the protests appear to be helping repair a rift within Mormonism caused by the election. The church’s outspoken support for Proposition 8 exposed an unusual level of disagreement in the ordinarily harmonious Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, as the Internet facilitated grass-roots organizing by the minority of Mormons who support same-sex marriage. But a smattering of anti-Mormon acts since Election Day - the burning of a Book of Mormon, a mailing of packets of white powder to Mormon sites, and some anti-Mormon invective expressed on signs and in sloganeering - has helped rally a denomination with a long history of persecution.

“I would not have voted in support of Prop. 8, but it does grieve me to see anybody being called bigoted for voting in an election and expressing their viewpoints,” said Julie Berry, 34, of Maynard. “I support the right to protest, but vandalism and damage to church buildings - that hurts . . . and I wish we could see a little more defense of Mormons’ right to exist as citizens and vote how they wish to vote. I’m sad to think that some of the social and political good will we’ve gained in the last 15 years may be set back.”

Share on Facebook

Tags:

Profile Image of John Cronin
John Cronin

Prop 8 Pushback

November 8th, 2008 | 43 Comments | Posted in California, Catholics, LDS

I saw a video this morning showing the street demonstrations being conducted by people protesting the passage of Prop 8 in California. They were marching down Market St. in San Francisco and they interviewed one of the leaders of the march and he said that he was no longer “asking” for his rights, he was “demanding” them. Never mind that his fellow Californians had just decided that what he was asking for was not a right conferred on him by the Constitution. It was his “preference.”

They also interviewed a member of a Catholic organization that had helped to pass Prop 8 and he was commenting on the partnership that has grown between the Catholic Church and the LDS Church, in defense of pre-born life and traditional marriage. It is very encouraging to see people willing to take a stand on these important issues, despite the risks. As you may know, there have been threats made on the lives of LDS leaders in the effort to defend traditional marriage in CA. Some have had to have police protection around the clock as a result of the threats.

I am struck by the anti-democratic attitudes of some of the folks opposed to Prop 8. Give us want we want or we’ll go after you personally. They are willing to abide by a popular vote, but only if it goes their way. Grow up, kiddies. You lost in the “market place of ideas” and the people have spoken.

~~John Cronin~~

Share on Facebook

Tags:

Profile Image of John Cronin
John Cronin

Jason Chaffetz Profile

If you are not familiar with the story behind Jason Chaffetz and the conservative principles that motivate his candidacy, please invest the time to acquaint yourself with the Utah Republican that I consider to be a Mitt Romney clone.

~~John Cronin~~

http://www.heraldextra.com/content/view/285061/1/

Kate McNeil - Daily Herald

On one hand, Jason Chaffetz wants to pinch himself.

After all, the 41-year-old Alpine resident accomplished the unexpected. In the June primary, he defeated six-term incumbent Chris Cannon to become the Republican candidate for Congress in Utah’s 3rd District.

But, on the other hand, the former Brigham Young University football player expected the victory.
“I’m a very confident person,” he said. “I know if I apply myself and give it 110 percent I can do it. I don’t want to sound cocky, but if not me, who?”

A product of the West, Chaffetz was born in California, attended grade school in Arizona and graduated high school in Colorado. Recruited by then BYU football coach LaVell Edwards as a place kicker, Chaffetz joined The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in college and hasn’t left Utah since.

After finishing college with a degree in communications, Chaffetz joined Nu Skin as an intern. He would stay at Nu Skin for nearly 11 years, moving up the ladder and holding titles such as managing director of marketing and product development and general manager for Australia and New Zealand.

Since leaving Nu Skin in 2000, he has worked at several other companies including at Covol Fuels, now Headwaters Energy Services. He now owns his own marketing business, Maxtera, with his brother Alex. Maxtera’s clients include Ford, Omni brokerage and Orchard securities, Chaffetz said.
Chaffetz says he didn’t plan on going into politics, though he’d been involved in political campaigns, even serving as co-chairman in 1988 of Dukakis for Utah. Chaffetz’s father, John, had married and divorced Kitty Dukakis before she married then Massachusetts governor and presidential candidate Michael Dukakis.

His conversion to the Republican Party happened over time, he said, starting while working during the 1988 presidential race. That’s when he says he discovered that he fit in better with Republicans. But the change was complete when he met Ronald Reagan in 1990, when Reagan came to Nu Skin as a motivational speaker.

Years later, another politician would change Chaffetz’s political life — Jon Huntsman Jr.
“… I thought I could put up a few yard signs,” he said. “That pretty much changed my life.”
In 2004, Chaffetz was angling for a job, any job, with Huntsman’s gubernatorial campaign. He had volunteered for other campaigns in previous years, including U.S. Rep. Chris Cannon’s in 1996, going so far as to write a letter to the editor lauding him as the best man for the 3rd District seat.

While Chaffetz hadn’t played a significant role in any of those previous campaigns, he was eventually chosen as Huntsman’s director of communications. Huntsman surprised him during a trip to Fillmore by asking him to take the next step and become his campaign manager. Shortly after rolling to victory in the state’s general election, Huntsman asked Chaffetz to stay on as his chief of staff, a job he freely acknowledges he wasn’t qualified for. While Huntsman would eventually tell the Deseret News in 2005 that Chaffetz was the “most gifted political strategist I have ever encountered,” his stint as chief of staff was both short and rocky.

He left after less than a year — the official line was “to pursue other business opportunities” and to nurse a badly broken foot that happened in a fall at home.

“Those two years working with Huntsman, the political bug bit me,” he said. “I thought, ‘I can do this, and I can do this better than Chris Cannon can.’”

He set his sights on defeating Cannon early.

“In early 2007 instead of riding my bike I was down in my basement, calling delegates,” he said. “More than a year before the convention I was driving to Richfield to meet three people. Good old-fashioned hard work — there’s no substitute for it.”

Statistically — 98 percent of incumbents in the House of Representatives win their races — and financially — Cannon outspent him by $600,000 — Chaffetz’s chances for victory were slim.

“We really changed the equation,” he said. “Traditionally big dollars plus big name identification might mean big victory. But now policy plus principle plus good old-fashioned hard work equals big victory.”

Chaffetz is where he is today because, as he put it, he raised his hand.

“So few people raise their hands but those that do make a big difference. A big part of my life is raising my hand when most others wouldn’t — it’s how I became place kicker, it’s how I became Jon Huntsman Jr.’s chief of staff, it’s how I became candidate, it’s how I met my wife.”

Now that he’s raised his hand to become the 3rd District’s congressman, the father of three has plans to revamp some of Cannon’s policies. His biggest plans are for immigration.

In September, the candidate faced heat for his suggestion that illegal immigrants should be detained in tent cities surrounded by barbed wire. Chaffetz says that his plan has been misunderstood or deliberately misconstrued.

“I want to enforce the law. And I’m sure that far-left, liberal Democrats like [New Mexico Gov.] Bill Richardson and Bennion Spencer don’t like it,” he said. Spencer is one of Chaffetz’s opponents in the 3rd District. “I’ve never said I want to round up people based on their ethnicity and throw them in a tent.”

He has since stated he regrets using the word “tent.”

“I can do better calling them eco-friendly, highly portable, low-cost detention facilities,” Chaffetz said. He now points to structures like those built by Utah company Sprung Instant Structures as a model. “You don’t go down to Cabela’s to get these things.”

Still, his stance on immigration remains the same, even calling for the elimination of birthright citizenship if the parents are illegal.

“We can’t reward illegal behavior,” he said. “We must hold people accountable when they break our laws. But we must also be accountable for the poor policy decisions that got us where we are. My priorities are to fix legal immigration, reject amnesty, secure the border and enforce our current laws. We must remove incentives to come here illegally and give businesses the tools to stay in compliance with the law.”

He’d also like to retool Cannon’s fiscal policies.

“Over the 12 years that he was in office, our budget doubled. There’s nothing conservative about that,” Chaffetz said. “We have to rein in spending.”

Saying that how a candidate runs his campaign is indicative of how he will be in office, Chaffetz is most proud of the fact that he has run his campaign debt free. His campaign has raised more than $359,000, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a group that tracks money in U.S. politics and its effect on elections and public policy.

In July, Chaffetz flew to Alaska and met with Gov. Sarah Palin to see the Artic National Wildlife Refuge and said he returned “more in favor of drilling domestically than ever.”

“We need to extract oil shale in Utah and on the continental shelf and I think we can do it in an environmentally friendly way.”

Although his opponent, Spencer, a Riverton resident, criticizes him for not living within the 3rd District, Chaffetz says, “I have a lot more in common with Utah County than anywhere else. We’re lifers here, we’re not moving.”

And while he admits confidence comes easy to him, Chaffetz said it will be humbling to represent 850,000 people.

“Hopefully I can stay grounded and represent Utah to Washington not Washington to Utah.”

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of John Cronin
John Cronin

Mormons Boost Antigay Marriage Effort

September 21st, 2008 | 8 Comments | Posted in California, Evangelicals, LDS, Mitt Romney, Mormons

Fine article in the WSJ commenting on the ongoing cooperation by Catholics, evangelical Protestants and the LDS Church in their fight to preserve the sanctity of traditional marriage. I have said in these pages many times, that while we have differences in our understanding of Christian theology, are shared values are so close that we are natural allies and, as we continue to partner in these important causes, together we are a political force to be respected or feared.

~~John Cronin~~

[Editor's Note: For purposes of brevity, I did not include the full text of the article]

Wall Street Journal Weekend Print Edition

By: Mark Schoofs

Mormons have emerged as a dominant fund raising force in the hotly contested California ballot fight to ban same-sex marriage.

Members of the Church Of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints have contributed more that a third of the approximately $15.4 million raised since June 1 to support Proposition 8. The ballot initiative, if passed, would reverse the current right of same-sex couples to marry.

The tally of Mormon contributions was provided by Frank Schubert, campaign manager for Protect Marriage.com—Yes on 8, the initiative’s primary backer. A finance-tracking group corroborated Mormon fund raising dominance, saying it could exceed 40%.

The Mormon Church decision to enlist members on behalf of the same-sex marriage ban as given supporters of Proposition 8 a fund raising lead. The campaign to defeat the initiative has collected around $13 million so far, said Steve Smith, a top campaign consultant for No on 8, Equality for All. Both sides raised roughly equal amounts in the early stages, said Mr. Smith, but “all of a sudden in the last few weeks they are out raising us, and it appears to be Mormon money.”

The battle has drawn in money from around the country. The Knights of Columbus, a Roman Catholic group, has given $1 million to support Proposition 8. Focus on the Family, a non-profit organization composed mainly of evangelical Protestants, has given more than $400,000. The Yes on 8 campaign has received “more proportionately from the Latter-day Saints Church than from any other faith,” said Mr. Schubert, 35% to 40% of the total.

Share on Facebook

Tags: , ,

Profile Image of John Cronin
John Cronin

Layton Book Rips National GOP For Anti-Mormon Bias

August 18th, 2008 | 36 Comments | Posted in Evangelicals, LDS, Mitt Romney, Mormons

I don’t know enough about the subject to even hazard a guess as to whether Mr. Foster’s book is accurate or not. I have posted this article as a FYI service to our readers.

~~John Cronin~~

http://www.standard.net/live/news/140695/

LAYTON — Frustrated by the treatment former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney received from the “religious right” in his run for U.S. president, a Layton historian has written a book documenting the anti-Mormon bias amidst the national GOP party.

The 244-page, softcover book, “A Different God? Mitt Romney, The Religious Right and the Mormon Question” by Craig L. Foster, lists for $24.95 and is now available online at Amazon.com and Barnes&Noble.com and is expected to reach book stores by Aug. 21.

The book was published by Greg Kofford Books, a Salt Lake City publishing company.

Foster, a 30-year GOP member and former Davis County party chairman, said his intent is to demonstrate there was an anti-Mormon bias by the “religious right” within the national party against Romney, a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

That bias was a significant factor in Romney’s failed attempt at the presidency, the 48-year-old Foster said.

Romney, who made Utah’s 2002 Olympic Winter Games a success, received about 90 percent of Utah’s Republican vote in the Feb. 5 presidential western primary, well outdistancing the field.

What frustrates Foster, an LDS Church genealogist and historian, is Utah Republicans are conservative party members who have been devoted to GOP candidates, including giving President George W. Bush his largest margin of victory in his 2004 re-election bid.

We all remember the South voting as a bloc for Huckabee. Mitt was strong in most of the early primary states, won Michigan going away and won most of the Western states in landslides, but the string of losses in the South was impossible to overcome, especially with the later narrow losses in Missouri and California.

The Bountiful Republican does admit Romney’s downfall in his campaign may have stemmed from opposition he received within the national party from segments in the South, where some view Mormons as being members of a cult.”When you get right down to it, it was a slap in the face of Utah Republicans,” Foster said, who, in the book, refers to the Mormon bias in boxing terms as “a low blow.”

While Foster and Christensen remain doubtful Romney will be named to McCain’s ticket, the state’s leading Republican remains optimistic.

State Republican Party Chairman Stan Lockhart said, based on everything he has read and heard from those within the party, Romney remains on McCain’s “short list” of potential running mates.

Before dropping out of the race for president, Romney had won 11 states, Lockhart said, and seemed to be receiving good response from GOP members across the nation.

Foster has authored two books and co-authored a book with Newell G. Bringhurst, “The Mormon Quest for the Presidency.”

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of John Cronin
John Cronin

IRS Investigating Internet Evangelist

Bill Keller, who really hit the Media’s radar screen during the primaries with his infamous quote about Mitt Romney is being investigated by the IRS according to EarnedMedia.Org in a story referencing the original article in the NEW YORK TIMES.

I thought his remark was way off base and apparently the IRS does as well. It will be very interesting to see how the case develops.

~~John Cronin~~


http://www.earnedmedia.org/wdc0624.htm

MEDIA ADVISORY, June 24 /Christian Newswire/ –

The New York Times has broken the story that Bill Keller, founder of Liveprayer.com with over 2.4 million subscribers to his Daily Devotional and host of the Liveprayer TV program, is under investigation for possibly violating his tax exempt status in speaking out last year against former Republican Presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s Mormon beliefs. Keller, who was the first Christian leader to speak out nationally against Romney’s beliefs coined the now infamous phrase, “A vote for Romney is a vote for Satan.”

Keller maintains that he has done nothing to violate his tax exemption status and says his attorneys are confident the ministry will be cleared of any wrongdoing. Keller stated, “I have every right to educate people on spiritual matters and deal with the pressing spiritual issues of our day, even those that transcend into the political arena. Unlike many Christian leaders, I have never, or ever will endorse any candidate for public office and have never told people who to or not to vote for.” He has recently been in the national news making the case that the Democratic nominee for President, Senator Barack Obama is not a Christian.

New York Times story from Tuesday, June 24, 2008: http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/06/23/challenging-the-irs/

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of John Cronin
John Cronin

Bush to Meet with LDS Leaders

May 24th, 2008 | 10 Comments | Posted in Fundraising, John McCain, LDS, Mitt Romney, Utah

In order to get a feel for how much John McCain needs Mitt Romney’s fund raising expertise, take a look at the figures below.

~~John Cronin~~

http://www.sltrib.com/News/ci_9343009

President Bush is expected to meet with LDS Church leaders next week, the first meeting since the new general authorities were sustained in February.

The meeting between Bush and the leaders of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is scheduled for May 29, said Rob Howell, a spokesman for the church. The White House has not released details of the trip.

“Romney had a very powerful fundraising operation with a lot of donations coming out of this area, and of course now he can leverage that to help McCain,” said Quin Monson, a Brigham Young University political science professor. “And the McCain campaign clearly needs the money to compete. They’re clearly not raising the small donors’ money that Obama is.”

McCain’s campaign report through the end of April showed that he raised $502,650 from Utah donors. Obama has raised $584,009 and Clinton raised $489,842 through the same period.

Romney, who was head of the 2002 Winter Olympic Games in Utah, raised $5.5 million before dropping out of the presidential race and endorsing McCain.

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of John Cronin
John Cronin

Ecumenical Meeting Marks First Time Mormons Join In Papal Gathering

April 20th, 2008 | 19 Comments | Posted in Charitable Giving, LDS, Mitt Romney, Mormons

http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0802159.htm

By: Beth Griffin

Catholic News Service

In an important ecumenical milestone, Father James Massa, Executive Director of the U.S. Bishop’s Secretariat of Ecumenical and Inter-religious Affairs has announced that two members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints have attended a Papal prayer service at St. Joseph’s Church in New York.

On April 18, two members of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, Elders M. Russell Ballard and Quentin L. Cook took part in the historic meeting.

It’s my understanding from the article that the Catholic Church and the LDS Church have also been co-operating with Catholic Relief Services (CRS) in helping the victims of natural disasters.

Kudos to both Churches for their generous service to those in need.

Click on over and read a very fine article on this ground breaking event.

~~John Cronin~~

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Vic Lundquist
Vic Lundquist

The 900-Pound Gorilla — RELIGIOUS BIGOTRY

Flag Waving

Though I provide analysis below, I do not suggest I have answers to the questions I raise. But I do raise questions that I think are of critical importance and consideration; not just to this current presidential contest, but more importantly to America. These are questions I think nobody wants to discuss (see photo below).

Tonight (1/29), I have heard the term “lick their wounds” several times. That is not at all how I feel about the loss in Florida. It is fair to say, I believe, that America as a nation, has matured in its history to a point in which a woman or a black man can be elected President by a majority of both sexes and a majority of those of the white or black races. I believe that America has come of age to the point that the bigotry we call sexism and racism, though still engrained in some people, has been marginalized.

What about the bigotry of religious intolerance? In an enlightened age, it is known by all that bigotry of any kind is not acceptable. In this modern day, we don’t generally hear statements of bigotry in common language in ways that were pervasive as recent as the 1950s and 1960s. Religious bigotry was even out in the open at that time as evidenced by evangelical ministers that routinely and publicly denounced the idea that Americans might vote for a Catholic. Today, bigotry of any kind, as a matter of common discussion in mixed company, is simply unacceptable in today’s diverse age. As a result, we do not hear public discussion about religious bigotry. Does that mean that this form of bigotry has also been marginalized to the point America can elect a Mormon? I do not believe it has. In fact, I think it is still pervasive, if now private.

In the states in which GMR won the Silver, by how much did he miss the Gold? Usually around 5%, maybe 10%. Today, he missed the Gold by 6% in a very large state. Since I began to seriously pay attention to presidential politics for 2008 back in 2006, I have seen poll results showing that a fair number of Americans are unwilling to ever vote for a Mormon; anywhere from about 20% of those surveyed to 40% recently. Since I have always concluded that America has matured to the point at which religious intolerance has been effectively marginalized, I more or less dismissed those poll numbers as based on simple ignorance, not bigotry.

Then, as the early state caucuses and primaries became history, I started to see a trend that I saw repeated today in Florida. It is fair to say that a majority of Americans do not find McCain acceptable as President as evidenced by his votes of 35% compared to 65% to all others. But to understand whether bigotry is at work against MR specifically, we need to drill down into the numbers. Is it not also fair to say that the most conservative voters of all would not be generally attracted to McCain, who is a well-known liberal Republican, or at least a Republican that cannot be trusted?

[In order to keep this commentary from becoming longer than it is, I use only the initials of candidates’ first and last names and any time there is a number, it represents a percentage]

In Florida, among evangelicals, the votes were JM(30), MR(29), MH(29). We can conclude that the 29 who voted for MR are not bigots. My presumption is that the reason MH’s 29 did not go to JM is because they consider him way too liberal to represent their values and principles. But if MH were not in the race, would all 29 go to MR? As you think about that answer, if they would not all go to MR, why would any significant portion of them go to JM? Incidentally, as MH keeps smiling and telling the world he can be the nominee, he knows he cannot. He won exactly 4 of all non-evangelical votes; that is par for the course for him. Since day one in Iowa, there has never been broad support for MH. Why does he stay in the race?

White evangelicals voted this way: MH(31), MR(31), JM(28). I think it is fair to say that those who voted for JM would be the more moderate or less orthodox evangelicals, simply because they could have chosen an orthodox evangelical in MH, and they did not. If true, and MH were not in the race, would MH’s 31 go to JM or MR and why? Why would an orthodox evangelical vote for the more liberal, twice married, untrustworthy Republican when they have MR, whose values and principles are much closer to theirs by comparison?

Of voters who think abortion should be illegal, the votes were MR(35), JM(29), MH (21). These are very conservative voters. We know 35 are not bigots and since MR won the majority here, we know that a very high percentage of voters know him to be strong pro-life. If MH were not in the race, would most of his 21 go to MR or JM and why? Of voters who think abortion should always be illegal, the votes were MH(32), MR(30), and JM(26). These voters are even more conservative overall. If MH were not in the race, would most of his 32 go to the more conservative candidate MR? If they would not, why not? Why would more than a handful go to JM instead of MR? Could bigotry influence their decision to go to JM?

Voters that identified themselves as very conservative were MR(44), JM(21), MH(20). It is well known by now that MR is the most conservative of both JM and MH. That being the case, if MH were not in the race, would his ‘very conservative’ voters go to the known, more conservative MR or to the less conservative, more liberal JM? And why? Could bigotry influence their decision to go to JM?

Over at Evangelicals for Mitt, both Steven Muscatello and Nancy French think MH should do “the honorable thing” and drop out. Read their excellent arguments here and here. But think of the context of my rhetorical questions above and consider this. If RG could so easily see the vanity of continuing the race, knowing he could never win, why can MH not see it? Or is it that he sees it and has ulterior motives? Think of the irony. RG, the person many have derided as ethically challenged, drops out seeing the reality; there are no ulterior motives really. MH, whose supporters consider the most ethical and upstanding man in the race, who would consider himself the most humble among them all, plans to “win the nomination” to quote him. Right. And pigs will fly for the first time in February. We now have resounding proof that MH cannot garner more than 10% of all non-evangelical votes and he has only nearly received 40% of all evangelical votes in one state. Clearly, he has no broad support, unlike GWB did as an evangelical. So, his decision to stay in the race is based on what? Ego? Vanity? Love of the sport? Is he lying to us when he says he is not running for Pastor in Chief? Or does he want to influence his voters away from MR and if so, why?

As many at this site have shown, MH revealed his stripes when he let slip his rhetorical Jesus/brother question in an interview. He also ardently campaigned in Salt Lake City to save the Mormons there from hell at the evangelical convention.

My opinion is that the frequent citing of 20 to 40 percent of all Americans unwilling to vote for a Mormon for President, the bigots are at the low end of the range. I may be naïve, but I do not believe that 40% of all Americans are religious bigots. Now, we know that when MR loses the Gold, the margin of loss is only 5% to 10%. That margin of difference is well below the 20% conservative estimate. Where are those 20% or so aligned? Are they divided among RG, MH, and JM? Are they mostly with MH or JM?

My conclusion is that the margin of victory that JM has enjoyed in any state, is a direct correlation to the reported bigotry still pervasive in America. If so, how does MR overcome this obvious bigotry, to win? These less than 20% “unwilling voters” are currently aligned with RG, JM, and MH, in some unknown mix. But knowing this does not help, does it? By definition, if they are bigots, MR will never be their choice. It cannot be argued that all 20% of these “unwilling” voters are in JM’s camp. Yet, it is he that is the beneficiary of their unwillingness to ever vote for MR. And clearly not all of the supporters left in RG’s and MH’s camp are bigots; but some are. So it is fair to say that if both RG and MH were not in the race, a fair number of their non-bigoted supporters would back the most conservative candidate in the race — MR. And why are the voters not following Rush Limbaugh’s advice to not vote for JM and MH?

So again, what is the motivation of MH to remain in a race he knows he cannot and will not win? Is his primary motivation to steer as many evangelicals to the Protestant JM, away from MR? If so, is that reason enough to not drop out of the race?

I think this issue is the 900-pound gorilla in the room with which nobody wants to make eye contact.

~ Vic

[Source of exit poll information above: CNN Politics]
.
.
.
NOTE: Any comment left at this post that is primarily religious based or which contains vitriol, is antagonistic, or generally obnoxious, will be deleted without notice. Please set a standard of discussion that is productive and illuminating. If you have religious opinions, please leave them out of the discussion at this post.

.

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Ann Marie Blodgett
Ann Marie Blodgett

Glen Beck’s Tribute to LDS President Gordon B. Hinckley

As most of you know on this blog, we try to keep most “religion talk” off of this blog. Since it’s been such a pointed issue for Governor Romney, it’s normally met with scorn. Well, to those of us that are LDS we lost our dear beloved “Prophet, Seer, and Revelator” this week. His name was Gordon B. Hinckley, and throughout his entire membership in the LDS Church, particularly during his Presidency he affected so many people. His sweet disposition was very unique is that he always spoke so kindly to others.

Glen Beck (who also is a member of my faith) did a tribute to this beloved man, and here it is. I hope that those LDS and Non-LDS alike can take something very positive from it, and positively change the world.



P.S. There is a great shot of President Reagan and President Hinckley in this video.

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Stephanie Davis
Stephanie Davis

Lame McCain

Looks like McCain’s McCain/Feingold reform has come in handy for him.  The Maverick Conservative has a great post on McCain’s attacks over the weekend.

As Andrew McCarthy pointed out, look how McCain is taking advantage of his attack on the Frist Amendment here (McCain/Feingold).  McCain’s “reforem” prevents organizations from pointing out LIES of a candidate (or organization supporting a candidate)  within 30 days of a primary.  That means that NO GROUP could point out McCain’s LIE about Romney in Florida.  Now ROMNEY himself can talk about it.  But otherwise you have to rely on the MEDIA (that is why McCain/Feingold was really a MEDIA POWER GRAB, as well as being an attack on the First Amendment)…

I can assure you:  McCain is full of it:  a suck up to the media rather than a true “straight talker”.  He got the REPUTATION for straight talk by SUCKING UP TO THE MEDIA.  He has always said what he thinks will endear him to the press atany particular time–whether it is consistent with what he said yesterday or not.  McCain has NEVER been intellectually consistent, or interested in FACTS.  It is no accident that the McCain/Kennedy immigration (amnesty) bill is all about DECEPTION (see the more than fifty entires in this blog under the general heading of “illegal immigration deception”).

Here’s what Andrew McCarthy had to say:

I’m starting to think Sen. McCain should not be allowed to mention the other candidates’ names within 30 days before a primary. I mean, he levels an allegation about Romney that’s just flat not true, and if some organization wanted to run an add calling him on it, they would be in violation of his “reform” of campaign finance regulations. What a racket!

Also, I believe there may be some Latter-Day Saint readers of this blog.  Mitt made a statement today on yesterday’s passing of the President of the Mormon Church.

“I was saddened to learn of the death of Gordon B. Hinckley. Ann and I respect him as a man of great faith and character. Like all people who knew him, we were deeply touched by his humility, his sense of humor and by the way he inspired so many people around the world. We will miss his leadership.”

Here is a more in-depth article on Mitt’s reaction.

Any predictions on the outcome of tomorrow’s Primary?

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Vic Lundquist
Vic Lundquist

A Woman? Sure! — A Black Man? Sure! — A Mormon? H*** No!

Flag Waving


Some pictures are worth more than a thousand words!

Is it not true that, as Americans, just about every person alive who can vote would not hesitate one second (so they say) to vote for a black man or a woman for President? That this country has progressed over the decades to the point where racial bigotry and gender discrimination are considered relics of the past? We know that both forms of bigotry still exist, but to a much smaller degree than in years past. And yet, religious intolerance, one of the great evils that drove people to found this nation, is still the most conspicuous, insidious, and unspeakable forms of bigotry that pervades this nation!

If you don’t believe me, get a copy of ARTICLE VI — The Movie and tell me I am wrong.

There are still millions in this great nation who are religious bigots beyond comprehension — sorry to say.
.
.

Artwork by Michael Ramirez — Courtesy of IBD Editorials

Share on Facebook


[ Copy this | Start New | Full Size ]