Browse > Home / Posts by Ann Marie Curling

| Subcribe via RSS

***Ads Do Not Necessarily Represent The Opinions of the Staff of comMITTed to Romney***

***Support comMITTed to Romney by visiting our sponsors***

Profile Image of Ann Marie Curling
Ann Marie Curling

Governor Romney on CNN Late Edition with Wold Blitzer

January 4th, 2009 | 5 Comments | Posted in CNN, CNN Late Edition, Mitt Romney, Wolf Blitzer

HT: CQ Politics

BLITZER: And welcome back to LATE EDITION. I’m Wolf Blitzer in Washington. For my next guest, a precarious situation in the U.S. automobile industry is certainly a family affair. The former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney’s father led American Motors back in the 1950s. Some have suggested that Governor Romney would be a good choice, by the way, to spearhead the industry’s recovery, to in effect become the car czar. We’re going to talk about that, the economy, and a lot more. The governor is joining us from Salt Lake City.

But first, I want to get your reaction, Governor Romney, to what’s happening in the Middle East right now. Are you with the Israelis? Are you with the Palestinians right now? Where do you see this situation unfolding?

ROMNEY: Well, you look at the — their current circumstances in Gaza, and you say to yourself, why in the world did Israel allow the rockets to be blasted into Israel year after year, 6,400 rockets shot into Israel without real military response?

From the very beginning, there should have been response to say this is unacceptable. Hamas was very clearly not a government intent on helping their people. When sovereignty was give on the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, they didn’t build roads, they didn’t build hospitals, they didn’t build schools or businesses. Instead, they bought rockets, millions and millions of dollars worth of rockets. They were intent on destroying Israel. And in a circumstance like that, Israel has no choice but to take military action. They’re taking it now. It’s terribly unfortunate. But the cause of this is the constant attack over the last several years by Hamas.

BLITZER: The Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal in Damascus on Friday railed against Barack Obama , and he said this. I’m going to play the little clip and translation.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

KHALED MESHAAL, HAMAS LEADER (through translator): Mr. Obama, your beginning is not good. You got involved and you had a statement regarding the issue of Mumbai, but you would not get involved and say anything about the enemy’s crime against Gaza. Enough of your double standards, oh, western nations.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

BLITZER: Do you have confidence that the incoming president is, from your perspective, going to do the right thing as far as the Middle East is concerned?

ROMNEY: I believe that Barack Obama is firmly behind Israel’s right to protect itself. He said so time and time again in debates as well as in statements since his election. The United States is committed to doing what’s right here. This is obviously a big question for a lot of countries because they look at the opportunity to trade with over a billion Muslims, many of them angry with regards to the Palestinian effort. But, in fact, Israel is in the right in this circumstance. They are an independent nation. They’ve been attacked time and time again by Hamas. And an independent nation has a right to protect itself against this kind of attack.

BLITZER: What do you think of this national security team that he’s putting together, the president-elect, with Hillary Clinton becoming secretary of state, Jim Jones, the retired U.S. marine corps commandant, the national security adviser, and holding onto Robert Gates as defense secretary?

ROMNEY: I think you have to be pretty encouraged. If you’re a conservative, obviously conservatives have had some difficulty with Hillary Clinton over the years, but she does have experience and she has some perspective with regards to foreign policy that I think will be useful. And General Jones and of course continuing with Secretary Gates is very, very encouraging. These are people who have been tested time and time again. I don’t think you’re going to see a dramatic departure from the historic commitment that we have to peace and prosperity in the world and the cause of democracy.

BLITZER: He’s talking about a $750 billion economic stimulus package. He wants it to be passed as soon as possible. It’s unclear if whether it can be passed before he’s inaugurated on January 20th. What do you think about this proposal?

ROMNEY: Well, I frankly wish that the last Congress would have dealt with the stimulus issue and that the president could assign that before leaving office. I think there is need for economic stimulus. Americans have lost about $11 trillion in net worth. That translates into about $400 billion a year less spending that they’ll be doing, and that’s net of additional government programs like Medicaid and unemployment insurance. And government can help make that up in a very difficult time. And that’s one of the reasons why I think a stimulus program is needed.

I’d move quickly. These are unusual times. But it has to be something which relieves pressure on middle-income families. I think a tax cut is necessary for them as well as for businesses that are growing. We’ll be investing in infrastructure and in energy technologies. But let’s not make this a Christmas tree of all of the favors for various politicians who have helped out the Obama campaign, giving them special projects.

That would be wrong. You’ll see Republicans fight that tooth and nail if that happens. Let’s do what’s right for the economy, and let’s not do what’s a political expedient move.

BLITZER: The economic bailout that the president approved for Chrysler and for General Motors just a couple of weeks or so ago, you’re not thrilled by that, are you?

ROMNEY: No. I think we lost an opportunity there, and maybe we can get the opportunity again in the next several months. But frankly, the U.S. auto industry, the domestic manufacturers, have every reason to thrive and to succeed in this country. There’s no reason for them to continue to lose share as they have over the past 20 years, if they are restructured. And if the excessive costs which they have in health care, in retiree benefits, in work rules, and in labor rates, if those things are brought in line with the foreign manufacturers who make cars here in the U.S., if they’re brought in line, the domestic manufacturers can succeed.

But we had the opportunity to do that, to bring the costs in line, the UAW balked, the industry balked, managers balked in the various company, and the job didn’t get done. And just bailing them out and funding a continuation of the historic loss of market share is not good for the industry long term. I want this industry to thrive and grow, and it can.

BLITZER: Do you think that they can come up with a plan, the auto industry, by the end of March, which they’re supposed to do, now that they’ve been given this lifeline?

ROMNEY: Well, it doesn’t take very long to come up with a plan. The answer for what’s necessary for the industry is pretty straightforward. The question is whether management and the unions will actually take the necessary action. And the only way that they’re going do that is if they realize they don’t have any alternative. And when government is willing to write checks and became them out and continue the status quo, they’re just funding a continuation of the decline of the industry.

You’re going to have to stand up to the UAW and to management and say, these are the changes that have to happen, and if you do these things, we’ll give you the financial relief you need, and if you don’t, we’re not going to help you at all. And that’s the only kind of leverage I think that’s going to get the UAW and management to take the necessary action.

BLITZER: You said you liked the president-elect’s national security team he’s putting together. What do you think about his economic team?

ROMNEY: You know, there are some very good people there. I’m very pleased with the person that’s going to be running Treasury. He’s a capable, experienced individual, having run the Federal Reserve or been chief of the Federal Reserve in New York. I’m very hopeful.

ROMNEY: Look, this is a time when we’re all hopeful for the president-elect. He was kind enough to call our home when my wife was ill, and he said that he and Michelle had my wife in their prayers, and I said, Mr. President-elect, Ann and I have you in our prayers. And we do.

All Americans — Republicans, Democrats, Independents — want to see this president successful. He’s chosen good people. If they do the right thing and put politics to the side and instead focus on what’s right for the nation at such a critical time, we’re all going to be behind him.

BLITZER: I notice in “The Wall Street Journal” on December 27th they ask you for your 2009 resolutions. Among your professional resolution, you said this, “I want to help restore balance in Washington. Our democracy needs two strong parties if we are to deal effectively with the challenges our nation faces.”

On a personal note, you said stop wearing a suit and tie to bed, which was very cute. But let’s talk a little bit about the Republican Party right now in opposition. Who is the leader right now of the Republican Party?

ROMNEY: Well, the great thing about our party right now is there’s no one leader. We have voices from Washington as well as across the nation. You just heard from Governor Sanford, but there are other great governors across the country that are making a real difference, Haley Barbour , Bobby Jindal . I won’t go through the whole list, but you’ve got quite a group of Republican governors and then of course in the Senate and the House, you’ve got strong voices.

And we’ll be listening to those voices. Senator McCain continues to have an influence in the party of significance. And I think you’re going to find that we will, as a party, represent a strong and viable pathway for America to strengthen our economy. That’s issue number one right now, is to get this economy going again, not with old political favors being paid back and earmarks being applied but, instead, by taking action to reduce taxes on the American people and on American business.

BLITZER: Who’s your choice to be the next chairman of the Republican National Committee?

ROMNEY: You know, I haven’t weighed in on that, Wolf. There are several good people who are running. In some respects, I’d hope for a very visible and prominent name to step forward. But that hasn’t happened to date. I don’t think it’s likely to at this stage, but there’s some folks who have been running the state parties and their respective states and some have also been running the national republican committee already.

So, among them, I think you’ll find that the committee chooses someone who can guide our party at a critical time. But really, I think the most powerful voices of the party are going to be elected officials in the Senate, in the House, and in governors’ offices.

BLITZER: You’d probably be a pretty good candidate if you wanted to throw your hat in the ring. Is that something you’re interested in doing?

ROMNEY: Not interested in that race, thanks. I’m going to continue to fight for electing conservative Republicans across the nation. I’m going to do that by fund raising, by giving speeches, by writing op-eds, doing whatever I can to talk about the need to have a strong second party in this country and balancing the overwhelming lead that the Democrats have in Washington right now.

BLITZER: Governor Romney, happy new year to you and your family. Thanks very much for joining us.

ROMNEY: Thanks, Wolf. Good to be with you.

Share on Facebook

Tags: , , ,

Profile Image of Ann Marie Curling
Ann Marie Curling

Giving President-Elect Obama A Pass and a Few Other Musings…

December 28th, 2008 | 5 Comments | Posted in Mitt Romney

I know that the title of the post probably won’t get me much love, but hear me out.

I am so sick of conservatives, Republicans, et al…making constant attacks against the President Elect. It bugs me about as much or more as those on the left who constantly attacked the Bush Presidency and didn’t give him much if any support to do his job. Now a Democrat has been elected President (and by a majority of the country I might add) and the so called “conservatives” and “Republicans” are in attack mode before the guy’s even been sworn in as President. Now, I don’t know about you but I respect the office of President and I find it at least disingenuous at most flagrant to do this. What about uniting the country behind our new President. Or are we going to continue to play the same tune and dance and use the tactic of negativity negativity negativity like we did in the 2008 campaign season. If anyone hasn’t noticed IT DID NOT WORK or do we think that if we try it again it might work? It’s a losing and I might add stupid strategy.

I think we need to give our new President a shot to run the country. I’m not saying we support every initiative that he puts forth, but can we at least see what he’s going to do before going into destruct mode? I think that President-Elect Obama has done a pretty good job at choosing his cabinet. Heck, despite his complete disagreement with our current President on the Iraq war, he has decided to keep his Secretary of Defense. I think that’s really saying something. He’s chosen people who fought against him in the Primaries to be a part of his administration. I think that’s pretty smart.

While I think it’s cool that all of us Romney supporters are staying together, and can reminisce about the past and look toward the future. I don’t necessarily believe that launching all these groups to push for him to run in 2012 is necessarily the smart move. Look what happened last time. I should know more than most. I started the first blog site promoting him for President for 2008. And I did it a full 3yrs plus before the election. Mr. Romney spent lots of time in Iowa way before the campaign got into full swing. I think that this may not have been the best move. People are sick of electioneering. They want a freaking break from it. Now I’m not saying we can’t have our own groups to talk about the future in politics, but we really can go overboard. Trust me, I know.

I have decided to step back from politics. It’s not to say that I don’t think about it. I am a political junkie. I still read politics, but I’m not giving my heart and soul to it right now. I’m enjoying my life, enjoying my kids, getting into some hobbies that I practically forgot I had due to my never-ending work to get Governor Romney elected. I think that we all should be doing this. Trust me, after doing it for 3 yrs plus, you’re not as fresh and on your message once the real campaigning begins. Not to say that I regret anything I did the last campaign cycle. I learned a great deal, and had I not jumped as soon as I did last time I wouldn’t have gotten to know as many as all of your wonderful visitors. I’m just saying I’ve learned a lot about how NOT to do things, and I’m taking all of this and will most definitely apply it next go round.

I guess that’s it for me for now. I hope it made sense. I hope you’re all having a very happy holiday season, with the love of your families around you.

Warmly,

Ann Marie Curling
Founder - comMITTed to Romney, formerly Elect Romney in 2008

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Ann Marie Curling
Ann Marie Curling

Best Wishes to Ann Romney

December 6th, 2008 | 11 Comments | Posted in Ann Romney, Breast Cancer, Health Care

From: CNN Political Ticker.

Ann Romney was diagnosed with “pre”cancer of the breast. I along with everyone here at comMITTed to Romney want to wish Mrs. Romney the best, and we’re so very happy to hear that this has been caught early. We’ll all keep her in our continued prayers.

Share on Facebook

Tags: , ,

Profile Image of Ann Marie Curling
Ann Marie Curling

Check Out This Site…Saul Anuzis for RNC Chair!

November 13th, 2008 | No Comments | Posted in GOP, Michigan, RNC Chair, Saul Anuzis

Saul Anuzis for RNC Chair, The Comeback Starts Now!

Share on Facebook

Tags: , , ,

Profile Image of Ann Marie Curling
Ann Marie Curling

Obama Undertakes Presidential Internship To Ease Concerns About His Lack Of Experience

October 29th, 2008 | 28 Comments | Posted in Barack Obama, Education, Experience, Internship, Leadership, Spain



Obama Undertakes Presidential Internship To Ease Concerns About His Lack Of Experience

Share on Facebook

Tags: , , , , ,

Profile Image of Ann Marie Curling
Ann Marie Curling

Romney on Glenn Beck

October 27th, 2008 | 11 Comments | Posted in Audio, Documents, Glenn Beck, Mitt Romney, Text

From GlennBeck.com

Windows Media Audio
Real Audio

GLENN: Gosh, I think it was a year and a half ago I said, gang, the only thing that’s going to matter when this election rolls around is the economy. I know everybody thought I was absolutely out of my mind crazy nuts when I said we are in big trouble and we could be facing another Great Depression. I don’t know what we’re facing now but we are facing dire, dire things in front of us. Every play has to be played exactly right. You know, when I say that, I want you to know that it’s going to be a great time in the future to be an American just like it was on September 12th. September 11th you didn’t want to go through, and in ‘99 I was telling you Osama Bin Laden was coming and there would be bodies in buildings in the streets of New York in 1999 and nobody wanted to hear it then, and there were. And let me give you the same kind of warning there’s going to be real trouble ahead, but the next day comes and we’re America again. And I said this to you a year and a half ago that the only thing that they were going to be arguing about in the end is going to be the economy and that’s why I said Mitt Romney was the guy to lead us. He was just with John McCain in Cleveland. We go to Mitt Romney now and I want to get some handle, Mitt, on have you ever seen a candidate like Barack Obama be more clear that he is a Marxist and people not listen.

GOVERNOR ROMNEY: Rally, Glenn, it’s interesting. I haven’t been around forever and I’m 60 now and in my lifetime I do not recall a presidential candidate who had a more antijob program than does Barack Obama. He plans on paying people off by giving them a check, you know, sending a check to everybody, a $1,000 check. But I think the American people would far rather have a job than a one-time $1,000 check. And his plan kills job. John McCain’s plan will actually create jobs. Barack Obama’s would take a recession and turn it into a deep prolonged recession, or worse. And, you know, I just think Barack Obama at this time is exactly the wrong course for America.

GLENN: Did you hear the — did you hear what he said in 2001? Finally the tape has been released and surprisingly not by the mainstream media, what Barack Obama has said about the Constitution? Have you read the transcripts or heard the tape?

GOVERNOR ROMNEY: Yeah, I did. I heard that he again is, you know, sad that the Supreme Court wouldn’t deal with redistribution of wealth and it’s a very different economic approach than the one that’s created America as the most powerful economy and the most powerful country in the world. You know, right now, of course, no one’s thinking about redistributing the wealth because wealth is disappearing, and redistributing wealth, that was the policy that, well, that some in Europe and other places in the world adopted and it led to economic failure.

GLENN: Okay. He is saying that he’s got — Barack Obama’s saying that he’s got this jobs creation program. As a businessman, I mean, I’m a small businessman. You’ve been a large businessman your whole life. Tell me the frothing at the mouth that people, just chomping at the bit to get that $3,000 that Barack Obama will give you for every new job created here in America. That’s his job growth plan. Tell me how great that is for business.

GOVERNOR ROMNEY: Well, I’m afraid that’s a drop in the bucket compared to the economic risk you take in hiring additional employees, and people take that risk if they see a bright future. And if they’re looking at higher taxes for their corporation, higher taxes for them individually, if they’re looking at fees or penalties for not having a healthcare plan that Barack Obama finds acceptable and if also they are looking at new efforts to unionize small business through this card check program Barack Obama’s in favor of, they’re simply not going to be thinking about growing jobs here. I listened this morning to a CEO of a major employer. I won’t mention his name but a very large employer. He employs over 100,000 people. And he said, look, you know, Barack Obama’s policies will cause us to build plants in places other than the U.S., and it is a job-killing program. We’ve got to support a job program like John McCain’s. John McCain is talking about cutting taxes on corporations, it immediately sounds horrible to people because of the perversion that we’ve allowed to happen, you know, with our press and everything else, where corporations are evil, where rich people are evil. Explain, if you will, to you know the average person that is struggling, busting their butt. Why a corporation getting a giant tax cut, why that makes a difference in creating jobs here in America as opposed to other countries.

GOVERNOR ROMNEY: Well, the simple fact is that corporations can decide where they are going to reside, where they are going to do their business. And they can be here, they can be in Ireland, they can be in Canada, they can be anywhere they want in the world and right now America and Japan have the two highest corporate tax rates in the world and so as businesses think about locating a new facility or even moving their corporate headquarters, they are free to go wherever they want. They are not like U.S. citizens that don’t have citizenship in a place like Hong Kong or China or Japan. They can go wherever they want. And so if you have high taxes, high corporate taxes, you cause businesses to go somewhere else. It’s as simple as that. In Ireland, for instance, the European Union, they said, you know what, we’re going to have the lowest tax rates. And sure enough businesses flocked to Ireland. They created scores of new jobs. People had high paying jobs. It was good for the people and it was good for the government as well because they got taxes from all the people paying income taxes. The answer is always create growth, create jobs. A job is so much more of an economic benefit than is a check from government.

GLENN: Mitt, let me talk to you not about politics and no about either of the politicians. Let’s just say we’re having this conversation the day after and whoever’s won, whoever won, okay?

GOVERNOR ROMNEY: Yeah.

GLENN: I said earlier this morning I believe this is the most important — and I will say this the day after the election, no matter who won. This is the most important time possibly in American history. The problems that face us, the decisions that we have to make, the time to know who we truly are and what we truly believe in, the values of America, we must reconnect with them because this is quite possibly the most important time in our country’s history. Do you believe I’m overstating that?

GOVERNOR ROMNEY: No, I actually think you’re right, Glenn. You know, in my campaign stump speech I used to say almost that, which is this is an extraordinarily critical time for our country. We face challenges from without. We face a new stronger China, we face Russia using energy to propel their new power and we face global jihad. So we face three fronts, if you will, from a national security standpoint. And then our economy is facing some tough competitive challenges. And if we become a second tier nation economically, we will have a hard time defending our freedoms. This really is a “Make it or break it” time for America.

GLENN: I know we have to let you go, you have other things scheduled but we’d love to have you back sometime this week if we could. I’d like to talk to you a little bit about the importance that Russia and Venezuela and Iran and what — everybody is looking at oil saying, oil, this is great, it’s going down. They are talking now it could go down to $46 a barrel, which would be great at the pump, but it is a colossal danger because these countries that we depend on for oil are now becoming extraordinarily unstable economically. Could we spend some time with you maybe later this week if we can get the schedules together?

GOVERNOR ROMNEY: I’m out campaigning for John McCain but we’ll keep in touch.

GLENN: Okay, thank you very much.

GOVERNOR ROMNEY: Thanks, Glenn.

Share on Facebook

Tags: , , , ,

Profile Image of Ann Marie Curling
Ann Marie Curling

comMITTed to Romney Expanding

Interested in having you very own blog here at comMITTed to Romney?

Examples:

http://annmariecurling.committedtoromney.com
http://johncronin.committedtoromney.com

Also, we are going to be offering email addresses off of comMITTedtoromney.net.

So, if you’d like to have an email like this:

johncronin@committedtoromney.net, we can set you up…

Pricing structure is as follows:

Blog and Email: $10
Blog Only: $5
Email Only: $5

Please contact me at pr@committedtoromney.com if you are interested. It should be a lot of fun!

P.S. We’re still looking for bloggers for this main site as well. We really are going to need to ramp up big time if we’re going to get the work done that we need to to ensure that Romney gets the 2012 Presidential Nomination.

Share on Facebook

Tags: , , , ,

Profile Image of Ann Marie Curling
Ann Marie Curling

Romney Angles For 2012?

October 11th, 2008 | 13 Comments | Posted in Mitt Romney

From The New Republic

Mike, I wonder how that Romney counterfactual, gloomy for conservatives, improves Mitt’s chances in 2012? Ever since he lost the GOP primary, Romney’s practically redefined the word “obsequious” vis-a-vis McCain. But he seems to feel there’s an opening now to gently suggest that a Romney ‘08 campaign wouldn’t have been such a Hindenburg. This week he took his first, timid step towards criticizing Team McCain, telling Joe Scarborough that “holding Sarah Palin to just three interviews and microscopically focusing on each interview I think has been a mistake.”

One Massachusetts strategist suggested this comment was actually an evil ploy to lure McCain into letting Palin give more interviews, thereby sealing her reputation as an idiot for a forthcoming Romney-Palin showdown in 2012. Say it ain’t so, Mitt! I didn’t think you had such trickery in you!

–Eve Fairbanks

I don’t know whether to be flattered or angry lol. Romney is smart enough to know what kind of deportment he should have right now. As for Palin in 2012 vs. him…Um, pardon me while I pee my pants due to laughing so hard.

As Rush Limbaugh says, “For those of you in Rio Linda” the definition for Deportment is as follows:

de·port·ment /dɪˈpɔrtmənt, -ˈpoʊrt-/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[di-pawrt-muhnt, -pohrt-]

–noun
1. demeanor; conduct; behavior

Share on Facebook

Tags: , , , ,

Profile Image of Ann Marie Curling
Ann Marie Curling

Would Romney Be Doing Better? (Said with the most indignant face possible)

From The New Republic.

Would Romney Be Doing Better?

The economy is collapsing and the GOP is stuck with a candidate who doesn’t know jack about economics. But what if Mitt Romney had won that hard-fought Florida primary and grabbed the nomination? Romney’s whole business career was about turning around distressed companies. Plus, he’s far less identified with George W. Bush than is McCain. And unlike McCain he might not have had to give up on Michigan, where his father was governor. (What state pray tell is McCain holding that Mitt couldn’t?)

I know there are plenty of strikes against the guy. But it’s an interesting counterfactual to consider–one that makes a lot more sense now that foreign policy has all but disappeared from the conversation.

P.S. Good point from commenter timteeter:

Or for that matter if McCain had sucked it up and made Romney his VP.

You might’ve had far less base enthusiasm at convention time, but delivering a strong economic message right now could’ve been far easier.

–Michael Crowley

Sorry for swearing here all, but, “NO SHIT SHERLOCK”. I think all of us here knew that a long freaking time ago.

Share on Facebook

Tags: , , , , , ,

Profile Image of Ann Marie Curling
Ann Marie Curling

Romney on The Early Show

September 19th, 2008 | 15 Comments | Posted in CBS, Mitt Romney, The Early Show, Video, economy



Watch CBS Videos Online

Share on Facebook

Tags: , , , ,

Profile Image of Ann Marie Curling
Ann Marie Curling

Attack Dog Obama Goes After War Hero McCain

September 13th, 2008 | 9 Comments | Posted in Barack Obama, Disabilities, John McCain, Smear Tactics, War Hero

[See: War Injuries Impede Computer Use For Hero McCain, But Obama Attacks Anyway!]

Share on Facebook

Tags: , , , ,

Profile Image of Ann Marie Curling
Ann Marie Curling

A couple funnies, just for old times sake…

Remember all the joking around about Fred Thompson? Here’s a skit from SNL about it.



Remember when Romney’s son Matt played a joke on him? Here’s that video…



Share on Facebook

Tags: , , , , , ,

Profile Image of Ann Marie Curling
Ann Marie Curling

Kwame Obama or Barack Kilpatrick?

September 5th, 2008 | 8 Comments | Posted in Barack Obama, Democrats, Friends, Kwame Kilpatrick

Aww shucks, ya gotta love friends…



Share on Facebook

Tags: , , ,

Profile Image of Ann Marie Curling
Ann Marie Curling

Romney’s Speech

September 4th, 2008 | 13 Comments | Posted in GOP Convention, Mitt Romney, Republicans, Speeches

For Archiving Purposes:



Share on Facebook

Tags: , , ,

Profile Image of Ann Marie Curling
Ann Marie Curling

Palin’s Speech

For archiving purposes:



Share on Facebook

Tags: , , , ,

[ Copy this | Start New | Full Size ]