Browse > Home / Catholics, Mitt Romney, Mormon, Mormons / Snarky……Salon.Com Alert

| Subcribe via RSS

Snarky……Salon.Com Alert

July 28th, 2008 Posted in Catholics, Mitt Romney, Mormon, Mormons

I stumbled across a snippet of an article from our friends over at Salon.Com who are the polar opposite of everything we stand for here at CTR. The denizens of Salon are nothing if not tedious in their attempts to shame those of us who live in fly over country, you know, bitter, clinging to our faith and our guns, over our general unhipness, mind-numbed allegiance to Luddite conservatism and above all, our tiresome affection for Mitt Romney.

There are, generally speaking, only two denominations that can be attacked with glee and abandon and with no retribution and those two are Catholicism and Mormonism. The hack that produced this little article, where he enthusiastically recommends another post by one his condescending buddies, drops the bucket down into the same well that was used by the Left throughout the primaries and lo and behold he comes up with the same stuff……Romney’s hair, did we mention he’s a Mormon, he’s a rich guy….sigh.

This kind of stereotypical thinking and school boy level taunting is why we will eventually take back the Congress and hopefully keep the White House. The Left does not have a clue about what makes us tick. This kind of pandering to their base where they use a candidate’s religion to frame the debate, rather than have an intelligent debate over real issues, is roughly the equivalent of waving a red cape at a bull. All it accomplishes is to further enrage the bull. But unlike the bull, we are not going to let our anger at our treatment lure us into doing something self-defeating. We are going to use that energy to continue to push hard for victory at the polls this November.

I am tired of the LDS bashing. I am tired of the Catholic bashing. You know, there is just something about being pro life and patriotic that really rubs the Left the wrong way. So, let Salon be Salon and we will continue to be anachronistic throw backs to another age and, unless I miss my bet, I can’t help but think that a majority of Americans feel more comfortable with our values.

~~John Cronin~~

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/snarky

snarky
One entry found.
snarky

Main Entry:
snarky
Pronunciation:
\ˈsnär-kē\
Function:
adjective
Etymology:
dialect snark to annoy, perhaps alteration of nark to irritate
Date:
1906
1 : crotchety, snappish 2 : sarcastic, impertinent, or irreverent in tone or manner
— snark•i•ly \-kə-lē\ adverb

http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/07/28/mitt_moneymachine/index.html?source=rss&aim=/politics/war_room

Mitt Romney: Republican ATM machine

Take a look at this great post from data-mensch Nate Silver of fivethirtyeight.com.

It tracks the potential fundraising windfall that John McCain stands to benefit from should he tap Mitt Romney as his running mate. Given the obvious distaste McCain showed for Romney during the Republican primaries — in Iowa, McCain’s campaign ran a tough but sarcastic push poll about Romney’s shifting social issue positions in order to help Mike Huckabee defeat Romney — there are two and only two reasons McCain would put him on the ticket, neither of which has to do with Romney’s gorgeous hair.

The first is that Mormon-based ATM cash card for which Romney holds the four-digit pass code. And the other is Michigan.

― Thomas Schaller

Share on Facebook

3 Responses to “Snarky……Salon.Com Alert”

  1. KKSM Says:

    As a great, great man named Henry B. Eyring once said, “criticism is America’s new blood sport”. Some people just are not happy unless they are causing pain, criticizing and just being downright ugly.

    What happened to civil discourse? I remember a time when people just disagreed but no one got ugly and “snarky” about it. They just hugged or shook hands or whatever and walked away. Are we all so unhumble that we can leave no room for anyone else’s opinion, feelings or heart? Where did the reverence for life and freedom of thought go?

    What happened to us?


  2. Mit 10 Says:

    Nice post KKSM. If Romney is put in as the VP, the liberals and the Huck supporters will get really dirty. It may well be that McCain needs money and that is why he will feel inclined to pick Romney but their is no denying that Romney was the #2 choice in the race. As far as voters are concerned he brings more than just $$$$$$$ to the race. I just hope that McCain will recognize and utilize his strengths. I know that some VP have not had very much responsibility but that does not mean that McCain will not utilize Romney’s strengths. And though I do not agree with McCain on several issues, he may end up being a really good leader. Obama is coming across like a very inexperience person. He really needs more time to develop before he is given so much responsibility.


  3. Steve Andrew Says:

    Sigh… I completely agree with KKSM, to a point. If you disagree with a candidate, disagree with he/she on their stance on the issues, not personal characteristics.

    Authors/editors, such as the aforementioned ones in your post John, rely on ad-hominem attacks for lack of creating a coherent rebuttal to the opponents tax plans or experience.


Leave a Reply


[ Copy this | Start New | Full Size ]