<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court Says States Can Demand Photo I.D. for Voting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://committedtoromney.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-says-states-can-demand-photo-id-for-voting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://committedtoromney.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-says-states-can-demand-photo-id-for-voting/</link>
	<description>A Community of People Committed to Conservative Principles Since 2005.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ray Hatton (Libertarian for Romney)</title>
		<link>http://committedtoromney.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-says-states-can-demand-photo-id-for-voting/#comment-106677</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Hatton (Libertarian for Romney)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://committedtoromney.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-says-states-can-demand-photo-id-for-voting/#comment-106677</guid>
		<description>As Libertarian, I oppose the concept of government IDs, and I suppose the applications there of, but being a desperate time of the illegal invasion, I support it for now in hopes of better days. I don't want those limy Democrats to get any of the illegal votes they pander to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Libertarian, I oppose the concept of government IDs, and I suppose the applications there of, but being a desperate time of the illegal invasion, I support it for now in hopes of better days. I don&#8217;t want those limy Democrats to get any of the illegal votes they pander to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2thepoint</title>
		<link>http://committedtoromney.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-says-states-can-demand-photo-id-for-voting/#comment-106658</link>
		<dc:creator>2thepoint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://committedtoromney.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-says-states-can-demand-photo-id-for-voting/#comment-106658</guid>
		<description>Our friends on the Democratic side of the aisle took this issue all the way to the Supreme Court because it's a problem for the Democrats who want to vote more than one time, are in prison, or are dead! Requiring a photo ID to vote is a no-brainer - it IS all about preventing voter fraud. I'm relieved that the Supreme Court got this one right! 

In October 2005 OBAMA publicly praised a district court decision to BLOCK a Georgia law requiring a photo ID to vote: 
http://obama.senate.gov/press/051019-obama_praises_c/
I hope someone in the media follows up on this and asks Obama what he NOW thinks about this ruling by the Supreme Court. ..

Hope this will encourage the 25 states who DO NOT require a photo ID to make it a requirement. ASAP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our friends on the Democratic side of the aisle took this issue all the way to the Supreme Court because it&#8217;s a problem for the Democrats who want to vote more than one time, are in prison, or are dead! Requiring a photo ID to vote is a no-brainer - it IS all about preventing voter fraud. I&#8217;m relieved that the Supreme Court got this one right! </p>
<p>In October 2005 OBAMA publicly praised a district court decision to BLOCK a Georgia law requiring a photo ID to vote:<br />
<a href="http://obama.senate.gov/press/051019-obama_praises_c/" rel="nofollow">http://obama.senate.gov/press/051019-obama_praises_c/</a><br />
I hope someone in the media follows up on this and asks Obama what he NOW thinks about this ruling by the Supreme Court. ..</p>
<p>Hope this will encourage the 25 states who DO NOT require a photo ID to make it a requirement. ASAP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ in Arizona</title>
		<link>http://committedtoromney.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-says-states-can-demand-photo-id-for-voting/#comment-106638</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ in Arizona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://committedtoromney.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-says-states-can-demand-photo-id-for-voting/#comment-106638</guid>
		<description>Some sanity finally!! We must do everything possible to protect our precious right to vote!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some sanity finally!! We must do everything possible to protect our precious right to vote!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori</title>
		<link>http://committedtoromney.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-says-states-can-demand-photo-id-for-voting/#comment-106633</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://committedtoromney.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-says-states-can-demand-photo-id-for-voting/#comment-106633</guid>
		<description>I applaud this decision.  Its time states were allowed do something to prevent voter fraud and not just wait until it happened to respond.  May there be a tidal wave of similar legislation across the nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I applaud this decision.  Its time states were allowed do something to prevent voter fraud and not just wait until it happened to respond.  May there be a tidal wave of similar legislation across the nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
