McCain’s Advantage and Economic Matters
While I do not agree with every aspect of Lord Black’s appraisal of the Presidential candidates, in this column, (most notably either Obama or Clinton being a capable President) he does make a perspicacious case for John McCain’s Presidential candidacy.
Stephen
Conrad Black on the 2008 presidential race: Whether it’s Clinton, Obama or McCain, the U.S. will have a capable new leader
Posted: March 28, 2008
National Post
(photo - Digital Journal) Conrad Black & B.A.
by Conrad Black
Heartfelt thanks for the thousands of messages of good will I have received from all parts of Canada and the U.S. and many other countries, over my present confinement.
Even those who are habitually dismissive of the U.S. political process seem to be entranced by this fierce struggle between senators Clinton, McCain and Obama. They are all impressive candidates. No other country has recently fielded such a formidable trio of contenders for its highest office, and they are a good deal more prepossessing than George W. Bush, Al Gore and John Kerry have been in the last eight years.
Barack Obama struck a resonant chord when he called for candour about race relations, but he will not squiggle out of 20 years of happily auditing Jeremiah Wright’s racist sermons by likening his pastor’s outrageous comments to the innocuous remarks of the senator’s white grandmother, who largely raised him and is now a poor, 85-year-old Hawaiian condo-dweller.
The man Senator Obama cited as a great formative mentor in his life has repeatedly stated that the U.S. government (under both parties) has deliberately propagated AIDS in Africa to depopulate the black world; that Americans should be petitioning God to damn rather than bless their country; that 9/11 was America’s chickens coming home to roost and that the worm-eaten canard that Franklin D. Roosevelt orchestrated the attack on Pearl Harbor was true. I don’t often quote Christopher Hitchens but he was correct when he wrote in these pages that these assertions were not “controversial and inflammatory”; they were “wicked and stupid.” Half of Americans practise a religion and most of them would desert a house of worship where they were routinely treated to such reflections. Obama told The New York Times in April, 2007, that he might have to distance himself from Pastor Wright, but he still hasn’t really done so. Many will want to know why. The racially aggrieved or guilt-ridden may be assuaged by Obama’s platitude about a “national conversation” about race, but most Americans will not.
Photo (bet.com)
Nor, if she is the nominee, has Senator Clinton likely heard the last of Whitewater and related questions. Turning US$1,000 into US$100,000 in one day of astute commodity trading with the tutelage of a local billionaire commodity specialist, in her first attempt at it in her life, is something the Republicans are unlikely to allow her to forget.
Mrs. McCain is the only candidate’s spouse who is still reckoned to be an electoral asset. After all the Clinton hype about two for the price of one, and a few of Bill’s clangers about Jesse Jackson and others, the ex-president was banished by his wife down the well-trodden (by him) path to the dog house.
John, Meghan, and Cindy McCain (Pic - Columbia.edu / Columbia College)
As for Michelle Obama, after a flurry of fawning comparisons with Jackie Kennedy, her statement that she first felt pride in America as an adult when a primary state voted for her husband (whom she had recently bizarrely accused of snoring and of flatulence while sleeping) caused her abrupt muzzling and virtual disappearance.
The Democrats and most of the national media seem not to have noticed that the defeatist truisms about Iraq have passed their sell-by date. Senator Clinton and Senator Obama seem to assume that the great majority of their countrymen recognize the Iraq expedition to have been a disaster and that that is the end of it.
The latest intelligence findings in Iraq, generally ignored by the national and world media, detailing Saddam Hussein’s long and extensive promotion of terrorism, leave the Republicans with plenty of room to reargue the casus belli. Iraq’s 75% reduction in violence, 30% increase in oil production, taming of al-Sadr and other factional leaders, and possibly the world’s highest annual economic growth rate since the upward “surge” in U.S. forces, seem not to have entered into the Democratic electoral strategy.
Senator Obama is proud of having opposed the war from the start. Senator Clinton is still trying to explain how she went from initial support to outright opposition, to a vague notion of gradual withdrawal not necessarily different from the administration’s policy.
Neighbouring Gulf states have expressed their satisfaction at the American presence and progress in Iraq. And Senator McCain, who approved the invasion, criticized the occupation and supported the surge, will sound a good deal more like a plausible commander-in-chief than his Democratic rivals.
Whatever else may be said of George W. Bush, with the surge he has appeared to be a felicitous combination of Washington and Machiavelli. His father and his father’s friends set up James Baker and Lee Hamilton’s Iraq Study Group to provide a fig-leaf for the president to withdraw from Iraq with whatever dignity he could salvage.
George W. smiled politely, sent two more divisions to Iraq, rather than withdraw, adopted a new strategy, fired the defense secretary and replaced him with Robert Gates, a prominent member of the Iraq Study Group and his father’s director of Central Intelligence. It was piquant and it has worked, and Senator McCain will rub his Democratic opponent’s nose in it.
The Democrats will mend their divisions as they did in 1968 when there was horrible fragmentation between Humphrey and McCarthy, after the assassination of Robert Kennedy and the violent disorders at the Democratic convention in Chicago. If the present administration can’t straddle to November with interest rate cuts that steady the stock market and the economy generally, but continue to depress the dollar, the Democrats should win.
If Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson can keep the ball in the air to Election Day without China breaking its currency’s peg to the U.S. dollar, McCain should win.
Whatever happens, it will be, as Richard Nixon used to say, “a rocking, socking campaign” (and he conducted many). The American genius for showmanship and propensity to commercialize almost everything, are about to reach their heights (or depths). But the result, whoever wins, will be a capable new president. 1
1. (http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2008/03/28/conrad-black-on-the-2008-presidential-race-whether-it-s-clinton-obama-or-mccain-the-u-s-will-have-a-capable-new-leader.aspx)
March 29th, 2008 at 8:35 pm
Really, I like how this guy gave a non-partisan look, but what country does he live in? The only capable person to be president in the mix we have now is well no body but I am going to vote McCain (Oh mixed feelings). Still I must say that I liked this article especially the following two lines:
“The Democrats and most of the national media seem not to have noticed that the defeatist truisms about Iraq have passed their “sell-by” date.”
“It was piquant and it has worked, and Senator McCain will rub his Democratic opponent’s nose in it.”
March 30th, 2008 at 12:11 am
Sarah,
Conrad Black is currently appealing his conviction handed down in a Chicago court last fall and is serving time in a low security prison in Florida. Black was the head of a newspaper conglomerate and is, or used to be, influential in conservative political circles and the upper crust in the U.K. and parts of the U.S. before his fall.
He has written two books recently, one on Richard Nixon and the other on Franklin .D. Roosevelt.