comMITTed to Romney!

10 Responses to “Democrats’ Rodney Dangerfield?”

1. shiggz Says:
   
   December 8th, 2007 at 1:55 pm

   On technical questions he would have an enormous advantage that would clearly shine through to even the most passive and indifferent of onlookers.

   Don’t underestimate her unrestrained attack machine, for now with Obama she has to hold back lest she look like a bully.(this will change if it gets to close) No liberal in the world would forgive her if she held back against a religious republican.

   Debates he has a clear advantage. The daily media storm will be a tornado rather then the headwind he faces now. Of course Romney does have experience running against a female liberal attack machine.

   http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/11/18/potential_clinton_romney_matchup_stirs_echoes?mode=PF

   “Former aides say Romney’s winning campaign against state Treasurer Shannon P. O’Brien in the 2002 Massachusetts gubernatorial race showed that Romney could gracefully navigate issues of gender, power, and party politics sure to arise in a contest with Clinton. The leading GOP contenders all say they would be the strongest standard-bearer against Clinton, but Romney himself has cited the O’Brien race as proof of his ability to defeat Clinton.”

   I think this should be touted as a clear advantage he would have against Hillary. If you think Hillary wont win just wait if dem race gets too close a bunch of women saying Obama did something with or too them will come out of the woodwork. If you don’t believe you must be new to the Clinton’s.

   
   
2. shiggz Says:
   
   December 8th, 2007 at 2:03 pm

   Another thing why aren’t we seeing more of Ann Romney shes very likeable. Her attitude toward him will heavily influence much of female(50% of voters) opinion of him. If she sincerely seems to like and respect him thats the cue they will take.

   I never go to public gatherings if my wife is unhappy with me about something. Because its like a huge attack dog whistle for all the other women in the room.

   
   
3. Eric Says:
   
   December 9th, 2007 at 3:53 am

   While Romney vs Clinton would be a dream, best be prepared for Obama.

   
   
4. John Says:
   
   February 22nd, 2008 at 1:01 pm

   Keep Bill and Hillary’s marriage out of this.

   
   
5. mark Says:
   
   February 22nd, 2008 at 3:00 pm

   Look in the polls, they didnt want Mitt a hell lot more!

   
   
6. Sarah Says:
   
   February 22nd, 2008 at 4:24 pm

   Yes, polls were dim when it was Mitt against Hillary. Lets face it. America was just not ready for Mitt. When will we ever be ready? When McCain/Fiengold goes down the drain. Read Ann’s latest article at http://www.anncoulter.com She makes sense.

   
   
7. bigmo Says:
   
   February 22nd, 2008 at 6:01 pm

   Mitt was facing the media opposition throughout the entire campaign that McCain is only beginning to feel, not to mention facing the brunt of shots within his own party. Give it a few months, we’ll be begging for the numbers Mitt had against Hillary…

   
   
8. andreahall Says:
   
   February 22nd, 2008 at 6:52 pm

   I want to know what these people are going to do about the war! I mean has anyone seen footage of what’s going on over there?!?! I found this video that you will not believe.

   http://www.mybluecollar.com/videos/b6b4c4af18

   Al’Quedy Bunch on BlueCollarOrDie.com

   
   
9. John L Says:
   
   February 22nd, 2008 at 7:32 pm

   nope, this country showed they don’t want a Mornin as president

   
   
10. Elizabeth Says:
    
    February 23rd, 2008 at 3:40 am

    John:
    The Clintons brought their marriage into the picture, courtesy of Bill (slick willie )Clinton. And for being mpeached for lying to the Grand Jury. I’m sorry but what is a Mornin?gez
    Shiggz, yes about the Clintons. Remember Gary Hart…….

    STILL VOTING FOR MITT!

    
    

Leave a Reply