<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Web Ad &#8220;Waltz&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://committedtoromney.com/2008/01/25/new-web-ad-waltzes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://committedtoromney.com/2008/01/25/new-web-ad-waltzes/</link>
	<description>A Community of People Committed to Conservative Principles Since 2005.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: SCannon</title>
		<link>http://committedtoromney.com/2008/01/25/new-web-ad-waltzes/#comment-83896</link>
		<dc:creator>SCannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.electromneyin2008.com/2008/01/25/new-web-ad-waltzes/#comment-83896</guid>
		<description>Real Clear Politics statics look correct to me.  They aren't including the InsiderAdvantage and Rasmussen polls because there are newer versions of their polls.  I still think Mitt is ahead....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Real Clear Politics statics look correct to me.  They aren&#8217;t including the InsiderAdvantage and Rasmussen polls because there are newer versions of their polls.  I still think Mitt is ahead&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://committedtoromney.com/2008/01/25/new-web-ad-waltzes/#comment-83762</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.electromneyin2008.com/2008/01/25/new-web-ad-waltzes/#comment-83762</guid>
		<description>I believe you W, although I'm not good at math, it didn't look right to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe you W, although I&#8217;m not good at math, it didn&#8217;t look right to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W</title>
		<link>http://committedtoromney.com/2008/01/25/new-web-ad-waltzes/#comment-83758</link>
		<dc:creator>W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.electromneyin2008.com/2008/01/25/new-web-ad-waltzes/#comment-83758</guid>
		<description>this is an effective ad.
Comment: Real clear politics is skewing the data! Real clear politics is leaving out 2 of the polls that Mitt won handily in Florida in order to calculate their “RCP average”. It’s a bunch of junk. The average shows McCain ahead by +1, which is wrong! Look at the bottom where there are two polls showing Mitt up by 5 (1/20 Insider Advantage and Rassmussen). They don’t include them in their calculation of the RCP average. Instead, they choose to include Mcain’s “survey USA” poll only from 1/20. The real “average” should be Mcain: 23.1 Romney: 23.9 (Romney +0.8)
Look at the link: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/fl/florida_republican_primary-260.html#polls
Poll Date McCain Romney Giuliani Huckabee Paul Thompson Spread
RCP Average 01/20 - 01/23 24.5 23.5 18.8 15.5 4.3 5.7 McCain +1.0
InsiderAdvantage 01/23 - 01/23 23 22 18 16 4 — McCain +1.0
Rasmussen 01/23 - 01/23 23 27 20 15 4 — Romney +4.0
Mason-Dixon 01/22 - 01/23 26 30 18 15 3 — Romney +4.0
Strategic Vision (R) 01/20 - 01/22 25 20 22 18 5 6 McCain +3.0
Herald/SPT/Bay9 01/20 - 01/22 25 23 15 15 3 4 McCain +2.0
OMITTED ******InsiderAdvantage 01/20 - 01/21 18 24 19 12 7 — Romney +5.0
OMITTED: ******Rasmussen 01/20 - 01/20 20 25 19 13 5 12 Romney +5.0
INCLUDED: ******SurveyUSA 01/20 - 01/20 25 19 20 14 7 7 McCain +5.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is an effective ad.<br />
Comment: Real clear politics is skewing the data! Real clear politics is leaving out 2 of the polls that Mitt won handily in Florida in order to calculate their “RCP average”. It’s a bunch of junk. The average shows McCain ahead by +1, which is wrong! Look at the bottom where there are two polls showing Mitt up by 5 (1/20 Insider Advantage and Rassmussen). They don’t include them in their calculation of the RCP average. Instead, they choose to include Mcain’s “survey USA” poll only from 1/20. The real “average” should be Mcain: 23.1 Romney: 23.9 (Romney +0.8)<br />
Look at the link: <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/fl/florida_republican_primary-260.html#polls" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/fl/florida_republican_primary-260.html#polls</a><br />
Poll Date McCain Romney Giuliani Huckabee Paul Thompson Spread<br />
RCP Average 01/20 - 01/23 24.5 23.5 18.8 15.5 4.3 5.7 McCain +1.0<br />
InsiderAdvantage 01/23 - 01/23 23 22 18 16 4 — McCain +1.0<br />
Rasmussen 01/23 - 01/23 23 27 20 15 4 — Romney +4.0<br />
Mason-Dixon 01/22 - 01/23 26 30 18 15 3 — Romney +4.0<br />
Strategic Vision (R) 01/20 - 01/22 25 20 22 18 5 6 McCain +3.0<br />
Herald/SPT/Bay9 01/20 - 01/22 25 23 15 15 3 4 McCain +2.0<br />
OMITTED ******InsiderAdvantage 01/20 - 01/21 18 24 19 12 7 — Romney +5.0<br />
OMITTED: ******Rasmussen 01/20 - 01/20 20 25 19 13 5 12 Romney +5.0<br />
INCLUDED: ******SurveyUSA 01/20 - 01/20 25 19 20 14 7 7 McCain +5.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic Lundquist</title>
		<link>http://committedtoromney.com/2008/01/25/new-web-ad-waltzes/#comment-83736</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic Lundquist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.electromneyin2008.com/2008/01/25/new-web-ad-waltzes/#comment-83736</guid>
		<description>Today on the Hugh Hewitt show, Hugh said this will probably prove to be McCain's John Kerry moment.  CLASSIC!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today on the Hugh Hewitt show, Hugh said this will probably prove to be McCain&#8217;s John Kerry moment.  CLASSIC!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
