McCain Has a History of Using Scare Tactics
December 29th, 2007 Posted in Campaign Ads, George W. Bush, John McCain, Mitt Romney, National Review Online, Powerline Blog, The Caucus - New York Times, The Union Leader, The Washington Post
THE MCCAIN WAY
“Senator McCain has a troubling history of neglecting substantive issues and getting personal in his attacks against those who happen to disagree with him. It’s the McCain way.” – Romney Spokesman Kevin Madden
McCain and Hillary share a “love-in” moment.

Sen. McCain Cannot Explain His Positions, And So He Launches Negative Personal Attacks:
- Sen. McCain Can’t Address Criticism Of His Tax And Immigration Policies Because He “Has No Good Response.” “Both responses by McCain have this in common — they fail entirely to address the substance of Romney’s criticism. The reason, of course, is that McCain has no good response. He did oppose tax cuts, support for which does lie at the essence of Reagan conservatism. Similarly, he did support comprehensive immigration reform and his line on that support now is a grudging acknowledgement that the American people (though not necessarily McCain) want border security first.” (Paul Mirengoff, “Romney’s Point,” Power Line Blog, Posted 12/27/07)
- Sen. McCain Complains That Discussing Policy Positions Is “Attacking.” SEN. JOHN MCCAIN: “If there’s any doubt that we’re doing well, it’s when Mitt Romney starts attacking.” (National Review Online, Posted 12/28/07)
-
And Now, Sen. McCain Has Launched A Negative Personal Attack On Gov. Romney. “‘I begin the ad by indicating he’s an honorable man,’ Mr. Romney said. ‘I believe he is a good person. I make no attacks on his character, no attacks of a personal nature whatsoever. I’ve just seen the text of his ad. It’s obviously of a very different nature. It’s an attack ad. It attacks me personally. It’s nasty. It’s mean-spirited. Frankly, it tells you more about Senator McCain than it does about me that he’d run an ad like that.’” (Marc Santora, “McCain Ad: Right Back At Ya, Mitt,” The New York Times’ Caucus Blog, Posted 12/28/07)
Launching Negative Personal Attacks Is The McCain Way – As Seen In The 2000 Campaign:
- In 2000, Sen. McCain Ran An Attack Ad Comparing Then-Gov. Bush To Bill Clinton. SEN. MCCAIN: “I guess it was bound to happen. Governor Bush’s campaign is getting desperate, with a negative ad about me. The fact is, I’ll use the surplus money to fix Social Security, cut your taxes and pay down the debt. Governor Bush uses all of the surplus for tax cuts, with not one new penny for Social Security or the debt. His ad twists the truth like Clinton. We’re all pretty tired of that. As president, I’ll be conservative and always tell you the truth. No matter what.” (McCain 2000, Campaign Ad, 2/9/00)
To watch the 2000 campaign ad, click here:
- Gov. Romney: McCain’s Latest Attack Is Reminiscent Of The 2000 Campaign. “‘It’s reminiscent of what he did against George W. Bush in 2000, which as you recall, he accused President Bush of twisting the truth like Bill Clinton,’ he said. ‘Again, this is the kind of nasty, personal attack, which really doesn’t have a place in this process.’” (Marc Santora, “McCain Ad: Right Back At Ya, Mitt,” The New York Times’ Caucus Blog, Posted 12/28/07)
These, On The Other Hand, Are Substantive Facts – Not Negative Personal Attacks:
- FACT: In 2001, McCain Was One Of Only Two Republicans To Vote Against The $1.35 Trillion Bush Tax Cut. The bill lowered marginal rates, eliminated the marriage penalty, and doubled the child tax credit. (H.R. 1836, CQ Vote #170: Adopted 58-33: R 46-2; D 12-31; I 0-0, 5/26/01, McCain Voted Nay)
- FACT: In 2003, McCain Was One Of Only Three Republicans To Twice Vote Against The $350 Billion Bush Tax Cut. The comprehensive bill lowered taxes by $350 billion over 11 years – including increasing the child tax credit and eliminated the marriage penalty. (H.R. 2, CQ Vote #179: Passed 51-49: R 48-3; D 3-45; I 0-1, 5/15/03, McCain Voted Nay; H.R. 2, CQ Vote #196: Adopted 50-50: R 48-3; D 2-46; I 0-1, 5/23/03, McCain Voted Nay)
- FACT: In 2002, McCain Was One Of Only Two Republicans To Twice Vote Against Permanent Repeal Of The Death Tax. (S. 1731, CQ Vote #28: Adopted 56-42: R 45-2; D 11-39; I 0-1, 2/13/02, McCain Voted Nay, H.R. 8, CQ Vote #151: Motion Rejected 54-44: R 45-2; D 9-41; I 0-1, 6/12/02, McCain Voted Nay)
- FACT: McCain Sponsored An Immigration Plan To Allow 11 Million Illegals To Remain In The U.S. “The McCain plan — which is being put forward in the U.S. House by Arizona GOP Congressmen Jeff Flake and Jim Kolbe — allows the 11 million illegal immigrants already in the U.S. to stay in the country if they apply for legal status and pay a $2,000 fine.” (Mike Sunnucks, “Napolitano, Hayworth Criticize Bush On Illegal Immigration,”The Phoenix Business Journal, 2/1/06)
- Rep. Steve King (R-IA) Called The McCain-Kennedy Immigration Bill “Amnesty.” “[McCain] has also teamed up with Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (Mass.), a liberal Democrat, on an immigration bill that many conservatives despise. ‘It would have legalized and provided a path for citizenship, which is amnesty, for 66.1 million people,’ said Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), who has called Kennedy and McCain ‘amnesty mercenaries.’” (Michael D. Shear, “McCain Fighting To Recapture Maverick Spirit Of 2000 Bid,” The Washington Post, 3/15/07)
- Manchester Union Leader Editorial: McCain-Kennedy Proposal “Would Encourage Border Jumping.” “Sens. John McCain and Ted Kennedy have a bill that, surprise, includes a generous guest worker program that would encourage border jumping. Illegals who register would have to pay a fine and taxes, but they would get to stay here and apply for permanent residency. That sure beats waiting at the border and hoping to be let in.” (Editorial, “Turnstile Security,” The [Manchester, NH] Union Leader, 3/27/06)

December 29th, 2007 at 2:56 pm
That blog name well you have the committed part right. someone needs to have you committed for supporting a liar like Romney. He needs to go back to lying to his congregation he will find that much easier than lying to the nation.
December 29th, 2007 at 3:01 pm
The fact that McCain is running for President is a “scare tactic” in itself.
I agree that his ads have a very mean spirited tone to them. He has a reaction to criticism of his positions that is similar to Hillary’s. “How dare you criticize me!”
The picture that you use in your post, the “love-in” moment, is very telling. I want the next Republican president to be “coldly correct” with HRC, not act like a fawning sycophant. The last thing I want to see, after all the effort expended to keep the Clintons out of the White House, is a president who will sell-out his Republican base to the DNC and cave to the Clinton crowd.
Speaking just for myself, I’d like to offer a new definition of “bi-partisan legislation.” We conservative Republicans and moderate Democrats will write the legislation and you liberal Democrats and RINOs will vote for it!
Great post, Ann Marie!
December 29th, 2007 at 4:34 pm
Wow,
Vicki Hampton is an intelligent one, isn’t she. Cut from the mold of McCain herself (when you can’t discuss issues, resort to personal attacks). I’m sure she didn’t read this whole blog entry or she would be quite embarrassed.
I would encourage all Romney supporters to continue to post to other’s blogs. But unlike Ms. Hampton and others that are sniping these blogs lately, I strongly hope we are more circumspect in our contributions. Stick to the issues, stay factual, and politely but clearly state why we are supporting Governor Romney.
So in parting, here’s a quick run down of several reasons I’m for Romney:
1. He’s a wonderful family man, devoted husband and successful father.
2. He possess a piercing intellect and understands deeply the issues.
3. He has demonstrated time and again the ability to assemble top notch teams, tackle large challenges, and lead various enterprises to success.
4. He has nothing to gain personally, certainly nothing to lose, but everything to give, making him, in my opinion, one of very few candidates that are truly running for the right reasons.
How many times have you voted against a candidate by begrudgingly voting for his opposition? It’s much more fulfilling to be for someone than against someone else. When there’s a lot to be for, we don’t have to devolve like others will.
December 29th, 2007 at 5:54 pm
Vicki,
Replace Romney with Huckabee and I agree.
Luvs
Steve