Gary Bauer exposes Huckabee’s weakness on illegal immigration
Courtesy of Marc Ambinder, we can only hope more Evangelical leaders recognize how damaging Huckabee will be to the Republican coalition and all him to the carpet.
The below is an email that Gary Bauer sent to supporters:
To: Friends and Supporters
From: Gary Bauer
Campaign for Working FamiliesDate: Monday, December 3, 2007
You Be The Judge!
As Mike Huckabee continues to improve in the polls, his positions on the issues are coming under greater scrutiny. Over the last week, a heated debate has broken out between Huckabee and many of the other candidates over the immigration issue, and particularly the question of providing benefits to the children of illegal immigrants.
On Friday, many of the leading groups fighting illegal immigration blasted Huckabee for his position on the issue. While Governor Huckabee now says he is against amnesty and for secure borders, he continues to raise eyebrows with his defense of scholarships and other taxpayer-funded benefits for illegal aliens.
Since the illegal immigration debate will continue to be a big part of the 2008 campaign, and no doubt a key item on the legislative agenda in 2009, as it has been in Congress for the past few years, I want to get your take on the controversy.
The Facts
When he was governor of Arkansas, Huckabee supported legislation allowing illegal immigrants who had attended Arkansas high schools to participate in a scholarship program to attend college. Huckabee lost that debate, and the bill failed. He also strongly opposed an effort by state Senator Jim Holt, also an ordained Southern Baptist minister, to end taxpayer subsidies for illegal immigrants in Arkansas and to require proof of citizenship in order to register to vote. Huckabee denounced Holt’s legislation as “race baiting” and “demagoguery.”
Huckabee’s Argument
Governor Huckabee strongly defends the positions he took as governor on aid to illegals. He argues that denying illegal immigrant students scholarship money would be punishing children for what their parents have done. He says, “my soul will not let me” do that. On ABC News this weekend, when he was asked whether or not he would support federal scholarships for illegal immigrant students, Huckabee said, “I’m not sure…”
Senate Democrats recently proposed the “DREAM Act,” which would have allowed illegal aliens to receive taxpayer subsidized in-state college tuition rates that out-of-state American citizens cannot get. The “DREAM Act,” like other recent immigration “reform” efforts, failed to pass due to overwhelming public outrage.
One year ago, Huckabee compared America’s response to illegal immigration to slavery by remarking, “One of the great challenges facing us is that we do not commit the same mistakes with our growing Hispanic population that we did with African Americans 150 years ago… I think, frankly, the Lord is giving us a second chance to do better than we did before.”
The Critics’ Response
Critics of Huckabee’s positions point out that many illegal immigrants are entering the U.S. because they want to get benefits for their children.
Increasing those benefits, such as college scholarships, would serve as a magnet for illegal immigrants. Since scholarship money is always limited, every scholarship that is given to an illegal immigrant student is a scholarship that is taken away from an American citizen.
In addition, they point out that while it is a Christian responsibility to help the poor, it is not Christian to take someone else’s money through the power of Big Government to redistribute it to the disadvantaged.
Huckabee’s critics also say that comparing slavery to illegal immigration is a complete distortion. Finally, they reject Huckabee’s argument that children shouldn’t be punished for their parents’ actions. Children do get hurt when their parents are punished, including when a parent is imprisoned for criminal behavior.
My Take
I think the critics are closer to the truth in this debate. I believe any Republican presidential nominee who has a soft record on illegal immigration will have a hard time distinguishing themselves from Hillary Clinton, who, as you know, is tripping over herself to avoid appearing to be soft on illegal immigration. What do you think?
Please address the issue I have presented. I have accurately described the two sides of the debate, so I am not sympathetic to the idea that simply posing the question is somehow anti-Huckabee.
Rather this is part of an ongoing debate we need to have in order to understand what the conservative position on immigration “reform” is and to ensure that we have a clear conservative nominee in 2008. This issue cuts across party lines and many Americans - Republicans, Democrats, Independents - were outraged by the repeated efforts of politicians in
both parties to push comprehensive immigration reform.
Bauer sounds like our own Vic Lundquist in his challenge to his supporters to come back with a fact-based arguement. 
December 4th, 2007 at 3:31 am
I saw a poll that indicated that some 95% or more Iowans are very concerned about illegal immigration. I will be very surprised if Huck gets any real support at the caucuses based solely on this issue.
December 4th, 2007 at 11:34 pm
I agree with the critics who say that it is a Christian’s reponsibility to help the needy and not the government’s. Several years ago the LDS church implemented what is called the Perpetual Educational Fund to assist people from third world countries with tuition and vocational training. It is one example, of perhaps many, where a Christian church and not a government is using its influence and resources to help the needy get education assistance. There is no need to be taking scholarshps from citizens and giving them to illegals and their children. It’s just another form of legalized plunder.
January 17th, 2008 at 2:10 am
I’m so saddened to see people who presume to present themselves as “Christian Leaders” like Gary Bauer who care more about getting Mexicans out of the country than they do keeping innocent babies alive. Those who were Senators did nothing and had no responsibility. Those who were in executive positions - Huckabee, Romney, Giuliani - did what they had to out of necessity when the Federal government refused to enforce the border and refused to build the fence. Romney is just as culpable as Huckabee and Giuliani in providing benefits and not penalizing sanctuary cities in his state. Just as he left he cynically enacted some token measures. But nothing at the state level will stem the flow with no border enforcement and an idle INS. Romney is demagogiing the issue for political gain. All the candidates got the message after McCain’s failed bill (perhaps even McCain). But can someone who changes his positions so quickly for political gain (Romney) be trusted to do anything he promises? I don’t think so.