Browse > Home / Archive: April 2007

| Subcribe via RSS

***Ads Do Not Necessarily Represent The Opinions of the Staff of comMITTed to Romney***

***Support comMITTed to Romney by visiting our sponsors***

Profile Image of Kyle
Kyle

Romney Agrees to Salem Radio Debate

April 28th, 2007 | 2 Comments | Posted in 2008

Governor Romney continues to show that he is the class of the GOP field. His latest move is to get glowing press coverage over at Townhall by being the first candidate to agree to their debate in Florida.

Check out these articles:
Jonathan Garthwaite is here.
Matt Lewis is here.

Lewis is worth quoting at some length:

Mitt Romney deserves a lot of credit for being the first candidate to agree to participate in this scheduled debate. This really says two things about him:

1. Romney gets the new media. By agreeing to participate in this scheduled debate (which would include a straw poll at Townhall.com), Romney’s campaign is showing they realize the world is changing — and that Republican candidates will have to use the blogosphere, the net, and talk radio, to get their message out to the voters.

2. Romney gets conservatives. This isn’t MSNBC. By being the first to agree to participate in this debate, Mitt Romney is helping support the conservative movement and the conservative blogosphere. And he is also showing he is willing to take questions coming from a conservative perspective.

I’ve known for quite some time that Romney gets conservatives. That’s because he IS a conservative!

The only thing I didn’t see in either of these articles is the date of the debate. Does anyone know?

-Kyle Joseph Farmer

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Kyle
Kyle

McCain Hates Iowa!

April 28th, 2007 | 13 Comments | Posted in 2008

Well, okay, maybe that’s not exactly true. But, he certainly doesn’t like the Ames Straw Poll very much and doesn’t have the sense not to talk about it!

Here’s what he said according to Jonathan Martin’s blog at The Politico:

“Would I prefer that there wasn’t an Iowa Straw Poll? Probably, because I could be doing other things. But that’s what the party wants and that’s what the party’s going to get.”

Wow…is that arrogant or what?!? I can’t imagine Governor Romney ever saying something like that. The Governor always seems to be enjoying the campaign trail.

So, if you’re out there in Iowa, remember what Senator McCain thinks of you and your party!

-Kyle Joseph Farmer

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Kyle
Kyle

Cofer Black Endorses Governor Romney

April 28th, 2007 | 1 Comment | Posted in 2008

This hasn’t gotten as much attention as it should:

Governor Mitt Romney today announced that Cofer Black, a former top counterterrorism official at the Central Intelligence Agency and State Department, has joined his campaign for President of the United States. Black will serve as Senior Adviser for counterterrorism and national security issues.

I think most people agree that Governor Romney’s strength is his obvious management skill. The world is still a dangerous place, however. And Rudy Guiliani’s poll numbers show that GOP voters know that terrorists still want to strike us (I won’t even pretend to know what whacko Dem primary voters want in a candidate). The way for Governor Romney to close this gap is by continuing to show that forward-thinking is the way to win the GWOT (see Mike’s post on nuclear terrorism below) and by gaining solid endorsements like Cofer Black. Go here to read the entire release.

-Kyle Joseph Farmer

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Vic Lundquist
Vic Lundquist

Dr. Richard Land: “Kingmaker” & Romney as Statesman

From The Wall Street Journal - The Weekend Interview

Today’s Featured Article: “Who Would Jesus Pick?

“The religious right’s would-be kingmaker talks about the presidential candidates.”

null

Ms. Riley’s interview of Dr. Land is outstanding; Mr. Land’s points are thoughtful and intelligent. Richard Land is the highly respected ‘Southern Baptist Convention’s representative in Washington’ — his perspective and opinions of any presidential candidate are obviously influential. But more importantly, his insightful comments here cast an important light on the national debate regarding who should be the next standard bearer of conservatism and of the immutable Christian-Judeo values Americans expect their supreme secular leader to possess.
-
null
By Naomi Schaefer Riley
Saturday, April 28, 2007 12:01 a.m. EDT
-
Following are excerpts from this great interview (unless otherwise noted, these quotes are Dr. Land’s):

Mayor Giliani:

Rudy Giuliani didn’t score many points with social conservatives last week when he issued this impassioned endorsement of the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold a federal ban on “partial-birth” abortion: “I agree with it.” He certainly didn’t win over Richard Land, who has said he would never vote for Mr. Giuliani. . . “If he’ll lie to two wives, what makes you think he wouldn’t lie to you?” . . . we have Rudy Giuliani, a twice divorced, pro-choice, supporter of civil unions.
—–
But it seems there is just about nothing Rudy Giuliani could do to change Mr. Land’s mind about his candidacy. “Three is one too many spouses for most evangelicals,” he says. . . What bothers Mr. Land is the “circumstances of [Mr. Giuliani's] divorce and the fact that there is more than one of them.” It’s not exactly a distinction the Bible makes, as Mr. Land no doubt knows, but he may be right about how much spouse-hopping evangelicals will tolerate.

Governor Romney:

Mr. Land might, on the other hand, vote for Mitt Romney. He says that evangelical voters may be able to get over their problems with a Mormon. “Charitably speaking,” Mr. Land says, “they would call [Mormonism] the fourth Abrahamic religion. When they’re less charitable, they would call it a cult.” And they might even let him off the hook for his flip-flops on the social issues. “A lot of people in this country who are pro-life didn’t used to be.”

Mr. Land says that reporters have misunderstood what it means that Mr. Romney has changed his mind. “Why does the liberal media call it a flip-flop? Because they believe in the moral correctness of their pro-choice position. The only reason someone would move from the morally correct position, as they perceive it, to the morally incorrect position is because of political expediency. But religious conservatives believe that their position is the morally correct position. So they don’t see this as a flip-flop. They see this as a journey . . . as growth.”

“Hard-to-Get”:

Richard Land is a man waiting to be courted, and on behalf of religious conservatives he is playing hard to get. He wants “to make certain that we never become as taken for granted by the Republican Party as African-Americans have been taken for granted by the Democratic Party.” . . . With a bachelor’s degree from Princeton and a doctorate of philosophy from Oxford, he has often been credited with providing the intellectual heft behind the religious right’s political strategy.

-
null
Dr. Richard Land [Wikipedia]
President of The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission
-
Senator McCain:

John McCain, who voted against the gay marriage amendment and who crafted the campaign finance laws that have done much to damage the anti-abortion efforts of religious conservatives;

Senator Thompson:

. . . or perhaps Fred Thompson, who supported McCain-Feingold and says that gay marriage is a state issue. Mr. Land remains oddly upbeat, particularly about Mr. Thompson, the possibility of whose candidacy he finds “tantalizing.”

“The Unelectable Candidates”:

But he acknowledges the reality of his constituency’s situation: “Evangelicals would be very happy if Mike Huckabee or Sam Brownback or Duncan Hunter were the nominee, but the problem with those three guys is they don’t give any indication they can win.” And he adds, “With Hillary Clinton looming on the horizon, electability is a very important issue.” . . . At the very least, the evangelical influence in the Republican primary will be diluted, with some religious conservatives thinking ahead to the general election and others going for the purest representative of their values. It is noteworthy that even among the unelectable candidates, evangelicals can’t make up their minds between a free-trade, open-immigration candidate like Sen. Brownback and a closed-borders protectionist like Rep. Hunter.

Governor Romney:

Mitt Romney is still a good possibility, but Mr. Land is waiting to see if the former Massachusetts governor will take his advice and give a major address on the way his faith influences his politics (à la JFK’s 1960 speech to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association on his Catholicism).

Speaker Gingrich:

. . . Mr. Land wouldn’t vote for Newt Gingrich: “I am not a big enough hypocrite to have made character an issue with Bill Clinton and turn around and vote for men who broke their oaths to their wives.” Having been in his current position since 1988, Mr. Land has had more than enough opportunity to see Mr. Gingrich up close, and he has not been impressed: “When he was speaker, when they went into conference to negotiate, it was always our issues that got negotiated away and his economic issues that didn’t.” . . . Mr. Land suggests that Mr. Gingrich was good at paying lip service to evangelicals: “He always understood how important social conservatives were to the coalition.” But Mr. Land believes that many of them have learned their lesson: “I think most evangelicals still don’t trust him.”

Consequences of a Giuliani GOP win?

If Mr. Giuliani does somehow win the nomination, Mr. Land predicts that “you will see a drop in evangelical participation in the presidential election and in races below that.” Sounding more like a preacher warning of a coming plague, Mr. Land says, “even if the alternative is Hillary,” a lot of evangelicals will stay home.

Ms Riley’s entire Journal article is a must-read! Outstanding.

Notwithstanding Dr. Land’s perception of Fred Thompson, frankly he and the rest of the GOP candidates are literal light-weights when compared to Governor Romney’s long list of beefy credentials. One can argue about how Mitt Romney has grown more conservative as he has aged, but can any rational person actually think Governor Romney is inferior to any of the other candidates (Repub/Dem) when considering depth of executive experience, dozens of extraordinary business turn-arounds, and success at virtually everything he leads? Compare any of the men above to his intelligence, drive, determination, persistence, energy, capacity, etc. Some believe, if Romney is elected, he will be America’s most intelligent President ever - I do.

Romney has joint law and MBA degrees with Honors from Harvard, founded and ran what is arguably the most successful private equity firm in the world, got elected as a Republican governor in the most Democratic state in the Union (Massachusetts), has real values that he lives by (been married 36 years with five sons and 10 Grandkids), set an all time record for Republican Presidential fundraising (Q1/2007) by outdistancing by a wide margin John McCain and Rudy Giuliani (both of whom had huge advantages due to their name recognition) and brought the 2002 Olympic games from a $350 Million deficit to a $100 Million in profit while inspiring the nation with his presence, decisiveness, and commitment; and this as a three-year voluteer!

Mitt Romney is the only true leader and gifted statesman seeking the Office of President of the United States. His only ambition is to serve America in the family tradition which expects service to God, family, and nation.

No. None of the legislators and values-challenged politicians who attempt to compete with Mitt Romney even measure up to his stature.
.
~ RHR

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of John Cronin
John Cronin

Clinton Says Southern Twang A Virtue

April 27th, 2007 | No Comments | Posted in 2008, Hillary Clinton

From BREITBART.COM…..

“Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday she sees her sometimes Southern accent as a virtue.”

“‘I think America is ready for a MULTILINGUAL PRESIDENT’”, Clinton said during a campaign stop at a charter school in Greenville, S.C.”

Nothing in the world wrong with having a Southern accent, except when it’s as phony as a three dollar bill. Is it just me, or does being multilingual refer to being fluent in more that one language?

I don’t recall who said it, but I thought it was hilarious when someone wrote about Hillary’s most recent trotting out of her now famous Southern accent schtick, “There goes Hillary, channeling AL JOLSON again”

~~John Cronin~~

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Vic Lundquist
Vic Lundquist

California: Mitt is Working Long Hours Next Week!

April 27th, 2007 | 4 Comments | Posted in California

What is each one of us doing to match Mitt’s work ethic to get him elected? Check out his schedule next week in the earthquake state:

Grueling California Schedule!

And what about the state of affairs in immigration in California?

Healthcare, Immigration and Politics

GO MITT!
.
~ RHR

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Nate Gunderson
Nate Gunderson

“The Mitt Romney Turnaround”

April 27th, 2007 | No Comments | Posted in 2008

Grant Everett Starrett is a student writer at Stanford University for The Standford Review. He wrote an excellent book review for Mitt Romney’s book “Turnaround”.

I will post the review here in it’s entirety because I was unable to link to it directly. You may find the original article by going to The Stanford Review site and scrolling down to “The Mitt Romney Turnaround”.

In the late nineties, the 2002 Winter Olympics were in serious trouble. Under investigation for bribery, bogged down by millions of dollars in debt, and losing public confidence, the Winter Olympics organizers relieved their leadership and went looking for someone who could work a miracle. After an extensive vetting process to find someone who could take on this insurmountable task of saving the Games while maintaining the utmost personal integrity, they came up with one name: Mitt Romney. Turnaround is his account of the crisis and its handling.

Romney was at the height of his career: His business was doing better than ever and he had little interest in running the scandal-ridden Winter Olympics. But the Olympics organizers persisted. Romney loved the thrill of a challenge – his business was built on turning around troubled companies, and his success stories include the likes of Staples and Domino’s – but he hesitated about the Olympics. The situation changed, however, in part due to his wife, Ann, as she put the situation in clear terms: the family was well-off and living comfortably, and the company could now be run without him, but America and the Olympics needed him. His consultations with Ann convinced him to take on the challenge, deciding to do it when he asked himself his mother’s favorite set of questions: “If not you, who? If not now, when?”

Well aware of the taint that the corruption of the previous leadership had placed on the organization, Romney pledged transparency in the organization’s financial dealings, and released all pertinent information to the public. By opening board meetings and revealing all his dealings, he was able to restore confidence with the public in the recovery of morals in the organization. But he went further. Romney personally performed a thorough budget review, and eliminated unnecessary programs, going so far as to require board members to pay for their own pizza at meetings. Between his cutting of the budget and increasing of the revenue, the Olympics not only emerged without debt, but instead with over a $50 million surplus.

Nevertheless, while Romney had a couple years to perform his financial turn-around, he only had a matter of months after 9.11 to beef up the security of the Olympics, then considered a prime Al-Qaeda target. Romney led the movement to rapidly ensure that the Olympics were as safe as possible for the athletes and guests, and managed the affair without significant incident.

But an important insight is also revealed in reading his book: he’s funny! Talking about newspaper reactions to his budget cuts, Romney lists a bunch of positive headlines and then one editorial that asked “Won’t these cheaper Games make us look bad compared with other Olympic Cities?” Romney writes, “I felt like answering, ‘Not as bad as if we’re bankrupt and can’t hold the Games at all, dummy.’ I saved that answer for a few board members who called to complain about the new frugality, although I left off the ‘dummy’ part” (106). In another portion, Romney talks about complaints regarding the commercialization of the games, writing that critics “complain that tickets are too expensive for average people. And of course, they would blanch at the thought that the taxpayers should pay for the Games. But just who should pay then? The tooth fairy?” (222). And of course, both jokes reveal a strong streak of fiscal conservatism, the former predicting his strong adherence to balanced budgets, and the latter his belief in capitalist solutions.

This book also reflects Romney’s corporate leadership style. Written more like a business book along the lines of In Search of Excellence than the typical political fluff pieces written by Presidential aspirants, Turnaround doles out credit to subordinates left and right for their work with the Games. Romney goes to great lengths to mention that, although his achievement was massive, he was not the only one responsible – and in doing so, he inadvertently highlights exactly what made him the perfect manager for the problem.

Scattered with literary references, personal anecdotes, and plenty of humor, Romney’s book is a joy to read, but also has information that strikes right at the heart of his ability to lead the country. Romney’s detailing of the US Olympic Team bringing into the Salt Lake City Olympic Stadium the tattered American flag that flew over the World Trade Center on 9.11 is absolutely heartfelt and will undoubtedly bring a tear to any patriot’s eye. He offers three key pieces of advice for success in Washington: Tell the whole truth, find the right fit for what you need, and never never never give up. Furthermore, Romney says that, as a public servant, he needed to do four things: Know why he was running, assemble the right people, perform a strategic audit of the state’s finances, and then communicate his vision. In the end, Turnaround allows readers the knowledge that Romney not only has the right ideas about leadership, but also has the managerial competence to get things done. America can rest assured when he becomes the 44th President of the United States.

-Grant Everett Starrett

Go to the link above to read the whole review. If you have not read “Turnaround” I highly recommend it, especially if you are not very familiar with Governor Romney and would like to know more. The book is very in depth and detailed, but not to exhaustion. Romney does an wonderful job explaining the many scenarios and problems that would arise (things that I would never think of), and then explains the very interesting ways they solved those problems.

~Nate Gunderson

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Nathan W
Nathan W

Dozing off to the Dems

My Analysis of the Democratic Debate

I was underwelmed at this first debate. The only ones that really pushed through with a heart beat were Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel, a Senator from Alaska. Everyone else was playing nice. How ironic it was for Kucinich, a true foreign policy dove, to wage a war on the other candidates along with Senator Gravel. Too bad dove is on the menu for the Thanksgiving after next.

Gravel is a dark horse running a lap around a black hole. He accused Brian Williams of making him feel like a potted plant on stage due to the lack of questions. He had quite of bit of fiery advice for the other candidates on how to shut down the war and follow through with what they say. Yet after making a joke using Ronald Reagan’s exact words without quoting him, I was ready for him to take another lap around the singularity.

Bill Richardson, whom I like the most if I was ever forced to vote for a Dem, came across the worst. The poor guy had the furthest spot away from Brian Williams, and he couldn’t hear many of the questions. I blame MSNBC’s audio crew for messing up this debate as Edwards couldn’t hear one of the questions too. Brian William’s guest questioner couldn’t keep the candidates in line with the time allotted. Which brings us back to Richardson; he just couldn’t share his message concisely. I’m wondering if any of his answers were in the time allotted. Towards the end he looked like he could use a powder (he was sweating). I wasn’t sure if it was his game face or a bad dinner, but the look of consternation on his face made me want to hand him a roll of Tums. Bill, it’s ok to smile during a debate.

Pundits were saying that Obama did a good job, but I just didn’t see it. I’m sure he’s a good guy, but as a communicator, I just didn’t follow. I’m not sure if it was his style, but after many of his answers I just sat there saying, “wait… what was he trying to tell me?” I heard the words, but the core of his answers didn’t seem coherent to me. The one thing I did like was when Kucinich was off explaining that foreign policy is about Utopia, Obama correctly explained that the Military is a tool to use against evil bad guys. Kucinich then explained that Obama’s statements were frightening away the Unicorns ;-)

Hillary did alright until the end when she started raising her voice a bit. Yet, Brian Williams interupted everyone pretty forcefully on time except Hillary. She often seemed to get a pass. Edwards did a rather good job, but had to admit to many mistakes. I especially liked the question posed not about why he spent so much money on his haircut, but why it was paid for by campaign funds. Oops… another mistake. I enjoyed his answer about who formed his moral influence in his life, but the uncomfortable 30 seconds waiting for him to answer made me think, whoa… I guess he doesn’t have a moral influence… next question please.

Was Christopher Dodd even there? ;-) Nothing much stood out. Joseph Biden had the best answer of the night, when asked by Brian if he would stop making so many gaffes and long winded mistakes picked up by the media, he answered, “Yes.” And silence ran out the clock until the laughter kicked in.

It was a long diluted 90 min debate, so much so Brian started asking candidates to raise their hands to answer group questions. The sad thing is the camera angle they used made it tough to see all the hands before it cut away.

I sure hope MSNBC gets their production act together by next week for the Republican debate.

Nathan W.

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Vic Lundquist
Vic Lundquist

Micromanaging Democrats Surrender from DC

April 27th, 2007 | 2 Comments | Posted in Radical Islam

“Surrender” — Governor Romney calling it like it is:

“Today, the Democrats in the Senate have joined House Democrats in sending to the President a bill setting a date for surrender. In their attempt to micromanage the men and women in our military from Washington, Democrats in Congress have settled on a policy that demoralizes our troops, emboldens our enemies and jeopardizes the prospects for success in Iraq. I urge the President to veto this bill and send a strong message to our troops that we stand with them.”

null

[ Cartoon courtesy of IDB Editorials ]

Another quote from Governor Romney:

“The policy that the Democrats in Congress have embraced is both reckless and dangerous. We must also thank those Senators who recorded their support for our troops and voted against this timeline for withdrawal.”

To see the source article form the National Ledger, click:

Mitt Romney: Democrats Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama ‘Surrender Vote’
, By Jackson Simpson
.
~ RHR

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Vic Lundquist
Vic Lundquist

Why Americans of All Parties are Joining Mitt

April 27th, 2007 | 1 Comment | Posted in New Media

Are you new to Mitt? Did you just discover Governor Romney’s extraordinary qualifications and experience? Are you looking for places to send friends and family who are exploring Mitt’s character and positions? Do you just want to know more about Mitt and his background?

A truly awesome resource created and maintained by our very own Mike Laub is one that I use often with those just now discovering Mitt’s extensive credentials. I have had many discussions with Mike and I am always amazed how dedicated he is to promoting truth about Governor Romney and exposing the lies of the MSM and his rivals. His site is not called “encyclopedia” for nothing.

Consider this one page. A great resource to which we can send friends and family to leisurely review why other average Americans like them as well as national leaders have decided to passionately support Mitt Romney:

“Why I Support Mitt Romney for President!”

Or this great spot. This is the home page of “MyClob”. Scroll down a bit and you will find this treasure of questions that have been asked of Governor Romney along with his answers. All organized by topic! Incredible! Check it out.

Mitt Romney Encyclopedia by Mike Laub

Thanks Mike!

null

.
~ RHR

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Vic Lundquist
Vic Lundquist

Mitt Speaks to “Friends & Family” Across America

April 26th, 2007 | 2 Comments | Posted in Community Outreach

On Wednesday, April 25th, Mitt Romney initiated a “Family & Friends” conference call joined by supporters from all over America. This partial transcript is provided from hand-written notes taken during the approximate 25-minute call.

[Thank you to Brett Gilliland for taking notes during the call and for providing those notes here. Brett is a Romney Democrat and passionate supporter of Mitt living with his family in Orange, CA]

The conference call was introduced by Alex Castellanos and those speaking during the call included Scott Romney (Mitt’s brother) and Spencer Zwick.

Today, the Romney campaign is going national. There is a new commercial on mittromney.com “I love vetoes”

Mitt’s comments (called in from New Hampshire):

As a nation we’re facing several serious challenges:
• Under attack militarily
• Asia – tougher economic competitors
• Domestic – immigration, education, etc.

When America takes on challenges, we should turn to our source of strength. Some feel our source of strength is the American government. Romney feels that our source of strength is the American people.

Feels he can help strengthen the American people. Areas mentioned include (but not limited to):
• Keep tax burden down
• Good, affordable health care
• Good education
• Keep oil costs down – energy independence
• Improvements in immigration
• Support policies that strengthen the family unit – “the family is what makes America what it is”

Romney expressed excitement/optimism about his political prospects:
• Doing very well in the early primary states
o Tied for 1st in Iowa and New Hampshire
o In another state South Carolina, he’s finished 1st in all the straw polls (See tally on Five Brothers Blog)
• The campaign has raised more money than any other candidate

Question 1 (from man in AZ) - What would you do about the death tax?

Mitt: Opposed to death tax.
• Unfair to tax people when they earn, tax them when they save and then tax the money they pass on to their families
• Would work to repeal the death tax
• (As referred to earlier), tax reform is high priority

Question 2 - Politicians are running from the immigration issue. How will you deal with this issue?

Mitt: “We value and support immigration, just not illegal immigration.”
• Need to deter places where people can easily cross the border
• Presented an idea of a work identification program that would allow a non-legal person to enter the country to work. They’d be given a work ID card that’s linked to a fed ID database. Employers would be required to only hire people that either are citizens or have a work ID and would be penalized if they hire persons that are here illegally.

Question 3 (from man in UT) - What part do you think your faith will play in the white house?

Mitt: There is no question that his faith has been and will be dissected and discussed
• Feels that Americans won’t choose their leader based on what church they attend, but what values they live by.
• The values he lives by have been learned from faith and family and will help his decisions for the good of the US people.
• Doesn’t get in discussions about church. Feels it’s not his place to do so as a Presidential candidate.
• “I’m running for Commander in Chief, not Pastor in Chief”

Romney then put in a request for an increase in the grass roots contributions from those on the call.
• Asked them to join (or find others to join) the community outreach program (headed up by David & Lauren Parker)
• By signing up, you’ll commit to participate in events, calls, etc., and commit to help raise contributions.
• This is needed to continue the momentum from the 1st quarter, and to accomplish the things they project in the 2nd quarter

Mitt continued, “Raising money is important all over the nation. A strong “grass-roots” organization is critical to my efforts. If you have contributed, please contribute again. Please ask your spouse, adult children, relatives, and friends to contribute, no matter how much. Please join my community outreach program. Let’s get this to grow across this country.”

Spencer Zwick: “Please get your friends and family involved. Join the Outreach Program now. Please make a personal contribution.”

Scott Romney: “Mitt is an unusual person. Incredible leader! Everything he has been involved in, he has made better. Those who meet him have an enormous passion for him and what he stands for. Mitt can make a tremendous difference in our country! Ask yourself, ‘Is Mitt someone I can trust?’ He is and he is worth supporting. We can trust Mitt. I appreciate your support. Please reach out to your family members and friends.”

Again, thank you to Brett for these notes!

Let’s all do what Mitt has asked us to do to get involved in this grass-roots effort and reach out into our communities! I personally know of two good friends who have already set up large “Debate Parties” in their homes next Wednesday. Each one told me he expects to have at least 30 people in his home to watch the debates together and then to have a Q/A session afterward for those who are “new to Mitt.” The other one is having sushi served (hey, this is California!) and plans to have a computer queued up to the Community Outreach Signup Form and he is asking every person in attendance to donate using his computer and their credit card. He said he doesn’t care how much they donate, but they will be asked to donate.

These are only two and they are just normal guys who are taking action; there are many doing this. Are you? We are all busy. Let’s make it happen now.

So, many are jumping in right now to make it happen. This can spread fast, but those of us who are enjoying the view of Mitt’s hard work from the balcony seats have been asked by him to come down to the stage with Mitt and help him. Right now is the time to reach out and invite others to join you. It is easy. Americans are looking for someone with integrity, drive, vision, and a track record of making their vision a reality to lead this nation.
.
RHR

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Mike Laub
Mike Laub

Policy Briefing: Combating Nuclear Terrorism

April 26th, 2007 | 2 Comments | Posted in Speeches

Key Excerpts Of Governor Romney’s Remarks At Yeshiva University (As Prepared For Delivery):

Governor Romney: “Today, America faces a number of critical challenges. In my view, at the top of the list is the threat of radical, violent Jihad and the associated threat of nuclear proliferation. I think many of us, including many of our leaders, fail to comprehend the extent of this threat. Take former President Jimmy Carter. President Carter thinks that Israel’s security fence is the thing that keeps peace from coming to the Holy Land. Having just been to Israel, I came to the opposite conclusion: the security fence is keeping peace in Israel - it is helping prevent bloodshed and terror and violence.”

Governor Romney: “We are faced with the horrific proposition that those who speak of genocide are developing the capability to carry it out. Radical, nuclear Jihad is the greatest threat that faces humanity. It cannot be appeased. It can only be defeated.”

Governor Romney: “First, I would appoint a senior American official to serve as Ambassador-at-Large to Prevent Nuclear Terror. He or she would have the authority and resources to work across agencies and departments in the United States to ensure that our strategies are coordinated here, and abroad.”

Governor Romney’s Strategy To Combat The Threat Of Nuclear Terrorism:

Today, Governor Romney Outlined A New Strategy To Prevent Nuclear Material From Ending Up In The Hands Of Terrorists. While there is a threat of nuclear material from nations like Iran falling into the hands of terrorists, we must be vigilant in preventing terrorists and Jihadists from acquiring what are commonly known as “loose nukes.” To guard against this nuclear peril, Governor Romney has proposed several new initiatives including:

- Expanding And Accelerating Actions To Combat Nuclear Terrorism. The Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism, which was launched last year, was a good start. Yet our efforts need to be greatly accelerated and expanded. Combating the threat of nuclear terrorism needs to be a top Presidential priority.

- Empowering A Senior Ambassador to Lead Efforts To Prevent Nuclear Terrorism. Governor Romney would appoint a new Ambassador-at-Large to Prevent Nuclear Terror. He or she would have the authority and resources needed to work across government agencies and departments to ensure that our strategies both here and abroad are coordinated.

- Making Nuclear Trafficking A Crime Against Humanity. Governor Romney would promote an international initiative to develop a new body of international law making nuclear trafficking a crime against humanity, on a par with genocide and war crimes. With universal jurisdiction, charges can be brought up in any court, preventing traffickers from hiding in complicit or weak countries. Already, people have been caught attempting to smuggle nuclear materials for sale on the black market. Their acts should not be dismissed as routine violations of the law.

- Creating A Gold Standard For Nuclear Security. Nuclear power can be inexpensive and clean. Countries seeking to use nuclear power for peaceful purposes should reaffirm their commitment to non-proliferation. For years, the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty has been at the centerpiece of this effort. But because of recent technological and political developments, we need to update our efforts for the 21st century, including a new commitment to stringent security regimes.

- Frank, Direct Efforts With Russia On Containing This Threat. Governor Romney believes we must engage Russia in a frank and open discussion about the serious and disturbing turn of events in their country. At the same time, we must continue to partner with Russia in securing their vast amount of nuclear material. Russia must play a central role in any effort to prevent nuclear terrorism.

- Removing The Incentive For Dangerous Civilian Nuclear Capabilities. The United States should take the lead in organizing and financing an international fuel bank to guarantee low-cost supplies of nuclear reactor fuel to countries willing to adhere to heightened security and safety standards. Working with the International Atomic Energy Agency, this initiative would promote the peaceful use of nuclear energy while providing new safeguards against diversion of fissile materials to terrorists.

Governor Romney Also Reiterated His Strategy To Prevent A Nuclear Iran:

Governor Romney Has Outlined A Five-Point Plan To Prevent A Nuclear Iran:

- First, We Should Tighten Economic Sanctions. The Administration deserves recognition for restricting access to banking and credit services. Other nations must act now to follow our lead. In addition, Governor Romney has called for strategic divestment from companies that support the Iranian regime’s dangerous actions. As the world’s financial center, no state could have a bigger impact than New York. After a new state Comptroller was named for New York, Governor Romney wrote the Comptroller, Governor Spitzer and Senators Schumer and Clinton urging them to join in the effort to stop New York pension funds from aiding Iran’s efforts.

- Second, We Should Isolate Iran Diplomatically. Their leaders should be made to feel like those of Apartheid South Africa. Until there are indications that high level engagement would do anything other than reward bad behavior, the United States should not engage Iran in direct, bilateral negotiations over their nuclear weapons program. Finally, Iran’s President Ahmadinejad should be indicted under the terms of the Genocide Convention for incitement to genocide.

- Third, Arab States Must Join This Effort To Prevent A Nuclear Iran. These states should support Iraq’s government; turn down the temperature of the Arab-Israeli conflict; stop the financial and weapons flows to Hamas and Hezbollah; and tell the Palestinians to drop their terror campaign and recognize Israel’s right to exist.

- Fourth, We Must Make It Clear To The Iranian People That While Nuclear Capabilities May Be A Source Of Pride, It Can Also Be A Source Of Peril. If nuclear material from their nation falls into the hands of terrorists and is used, it would provoke a devastating response from the civilized world. The military option remains on the table.

- Fifth, Our Strategy Must Be Integrated Into A Broader Approach To The Muslim World. We must work with moderate Muslim communities and leaders to build a lasting Partnership for Prosperity and Progress.

For more speeches go here.

~ Mike

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Vic Lundquist
Vic Lundquist

“EXPERIENCE” — Governor Romney vs. Senator McCain?

April 26th, 2007 | 4 Comments | Posted in Character, Competitors, John McCain

Did anybody catch the Larry King interview of John McCain last night?

I don’t know how many times Senator McCain said, “I am the most experienced of all the candidates in the race”, but it was at least three times as I recall. Now, I believe he was referring to both the Democrats and Republicans in the race. I would like to know how he is more “experienced” by comparison to Governor Mitt Romney. I will give Mr. McCain this: He suffered as a POW like no human should ever have to suffer and as an American he did so honorably and served his country in amazing ways.

So with FULL AND COMPLETE RESPECT to Senator McCain, I ask these rhetorical questions (see below). Before I write the questions, you have to read Nancy French’s brief editorial on McCain’s announcement yesterday. Classic!! Click:

………………..McCain and Piggly Wiggly

null

McCain’s Executive “Experience”:

* What McCain experience even comes close to Mitt’s rescue of the 2002 Winter Olympics that took a full three years out of his life at a time when his company’s revenue and his personal wealth were increasing at all time levels? He did not have to do that. He took three years out as a volunteer and subjected himself to day-in and day-out criticism for that first year when collapse was possible every day. Want details? Click here: 2002 Winter Olympics

* What McCain experience measures up to Romney being asked by a former partner to come in and rescue the former company he ran and which was near financial collapse? That venture was anything from easy and Mitt was masterful!

* What McCain experience even compares to the dozens of turn-around efforts Mitt engaged in over the years that not only resulted in astounding successes, but extraordinary results overall? And not just a few, but many!

* What McCain experience measures to Mitt’s helping build the likes of Dominos Pizza and Staples?

* What McCain experience has he had that has yielded a legendary reputation that whatever project he takes on results in extraordinary success?

Granted, Mitt Romney is not a legislator. For me, “legislator” = “bureaucrat” — this may be one reason American have only elected three of them to be presidents EVER in her history. Three.

McCain is an American hero. However, his executive “experience” by comparison to Mitt Romney’s is weak (that is referring to the type and kind of experience needed to really make changes in Washington).

No Senator McCain. I disagree with your assertion that you are the most “experienced” candidate. That distinction goes to Governor Mitt Romney. His executive experience combined with his true leadership make him the most qualified to be president.
.
RHR

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Ann Marie Curling
Ann Marie Curling

Going to be gone for a while…

April 25th, 2007 | 14 Comments | Posted in 2008

I am about to leave to hospitalize two of my children. They will likely be hospitalized for up to a week. I am leaving the blog in the great hands of Victor and Mike. I’m sorry about the abruptness of this, but I virtually have zero choice in the matter, in that I have to get my children healthy. I have not been very active on the blog of late due to serious medical concerns within my immediate family, and I know I’ve discussed this in the past, but if you could pray for my family I would greatly appreciate it.

Best,

Ann Marie

P.S. It’s probably obvious but I wanted to reiterate that if you need any help or have issues contact Victor or Mike.

Share on Facebook

Profile Image of Kyle
Kyle

A Must Read For Evangelicals

April 25th, 2007 | 3 Comments | Posted in 2008

As an evangelical Christian and committed Romney supporter, I read Mark DeMoss’s article in the Politico yesterday with a great deal of interest. His article is EXCELLENT and should be read by every Evangelical who will vote in the Primaries next year. Here is just a bit of what DeMoss had to say:

Last fall near Boston, a dozen evangelical leaders joined me for a three-hour conversation in the living room of then-Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who, as the world knows, is a Mormon. Over soup and sandwiches, the Republican presidential hopeful took questions about Iraq, Iran, North Korea, immigration, government spending, taxes, the Supreme Court, abortion, stem cell research and the federal marriage amendment. Two of his lunch guests quizzed him about faith — about Jesus and salvation.

The meeting broke ground, if only for bucking conventional wisdom that evangelicals would reject out of hand a Mormon running for president. I would not presume to think that the governor converted all of his lunch guests to his campaign. But, having spent my entire life in evangelical circles, I will say that I do believe many evangelicals will conclude they can — and indeed will — support this Mormon in 2008.

A month before this luncheon, I’d spent an hour in Romney’s office, wanting to hear firsthand his vision for the country. After studying his life and career for a number of months, I told the governor that not only could I support him (a number of evangelicals have said as much), but also that I would support him.

If you know anyone who is struggling with the fact that Governor Romney is a member of the LDS church, please go here and print the article out and give it to them. Email the article to them. Send them the link to this post. Just get them to read it!!!

-Kyle Joseph Farmer

Share on Facebook


[ Copy this | Start New | Full Size ]