The Flash plugin is required to view this content. Please click here to download the plugin.

Archive for February, 2007

Feb 28 2007

Profile Image of Vic Lundquist
Vic Lundquist

Giuliani Appointed 8 Democratic Judges for each Republican Judge Appointed

Ben Smith’s article from Politico.com is interesting today. This is a short quote from a very balanced article on the subject:

A Politico review of the 75 judges Giuliani appointed to three of New York state’s lower courts found that Democrats outnumbered Republicans by more than 8 to 1. One of his appointments was an officer of the International Association of Lesbian and Gay Judges.

Click here for the ENTIRE ARTICLE

~ Vic Lundquist

5 responses so far

Feb 28 2007

Profile Image of Vic Lundquist
Vic Lundquist

McCain Implosion Predicted - Happening Now?

Filed under Rudolph Giuliani

Rumors have been circulating for several days now that McCain’s campaign is in the process of collapsing under its own weight of high cost help; lack of cash. But is it collapsing? Following are excerpts from two sources, Townhall.com (Dick Morris) and ABC News (Teddy Davis).

It has been interesting to me that so many people have continued to be interested in a candidate who always seems to be morose at worse and near second stage REM sleep at best. Mr. McCain is a true American patriot no matter how you shake it. And he continues to have a huge stake in America with two sons serving our nation in the military. But I think he is done. I think it may be time to have him take an easy chair and watch from the margins. I do think that Morris is correct about McCain. In this piece he is wrong on Romney as it appears he has not done his research on Romney’s actual positions, legislation he has enacted, and expert endorsements he has received that completely counter Morris’ assertions to the contrary.

Following are excerpts from Dick Morris’ latest pontificating in Townhall.com today:

The John McCain candidacy, launched amid much hope, fanfare, and high expectations, may be dying before our eyes.
Even worse, it may go out with a whimper instead of a bang.
It may not end in an Armageddon style primary defeat, but just dry up from lack of support, money, or interest.
_____

What is McCain’s problem?
Why did he go from the most exciting candidate in the race a year ago to the verge of oblivion today?

Fundamentally, he failed to heed the Shakespeare’s admonition “to thine own self be true.” The John McCain of the 2000 campaign is nowhere in evidence in 2007.

Instead of challenging the party establishment, he pathetically waits at its door, hoping to be invited. Where he used to challenge the religious right, he now panders to them. Once he led the battle against big tobacco, for corporate governance reform, in favor of campaign financing changes, and in support of action against global warming.

Now he has been identified with two issues, neither popular in the Republican Party: The Iraqi troop surge and amnesty for illegal aliens.
_____

Republican strategist and Reagan campaign manager Ed Rollins makes an interesting point about McCain: He has switched roles. He has gone from being the McCain of the 2000 race, challenging the party orthodoxy, offering new ideas, and demanding reforms and changes to the Bush of the 2000, toeing the party line and only timidly venturing different ideas if he advances them at all. And this is no way to win the presidency or even the Republican nomination. But where it has counted, on the two core issues that move Republican voters these days — tax cuts and immigration — McCain is badly out of step with the GOP base.
He voted against the Bush tax cuts, the only real success of the administration and the main accomplishment of the president’s first term. On immigration, his bill, cosponsored by Ted Kennedy, permits illegal aliens to become citizens without returning to their native lands and seeking legal entry.
_____

He looks small, shrunken, weak, cowed, and timid. He shows all of his 70 years of age including the roughly lived period at the hands of the tender mercies of the North Vietnamese. It is hard to imagine him as a strong leader as he meekly answers questions from the likes of Tim Russert and George Stephanopoulos.

Click here for ENTIRE ARTICLE

Following is the entire ABC News article by Teddy Davis about a possible McCain collapse. Donilon says McCain is “the unchange”. Mitt Romney has always been be the man of the hour for innovation and positive change. I have always thought in many ways Romney and McCain are polar opposites within the same party in that Romney is a true statesman and McCain is a true politician; one of many contrasts between them.

Two Washington veterans agreed Wednesday that a “change dynamic” is at work in a 2008 presidential campaign dominated by the war in Iraq. They disagreed, however, about what it means for the presidential aspirations of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.

“In a change dynamic, McCain is the un-change,” said Tom Donilon, a former Clinton administration official who has served as senior adviser to Democratic presidents and presidential candidates for 20 years.

Former Reagan chief of staff Ken Duberstein disagreed with Donilon on the question of whether McCain’s presidential bid has suffered a “collapse” as a result of embracing President Bush’s plan to increase U.S. troop levels in Iraq by more than 20,000.

Duberstein and Donilon offered their assessments of the 2008 presidential race during the first panel discussion of a joint project between the Brookings Institution and ABC News. The joint project is called “Opportunity ‘08: Independent Ideas for Our Next President.”

Wednesday’s discussion, which was moderated by ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos, came on the heels of an ABC News/Washington Post poll showing former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani holding a two-to-one advantage over McCain among Republican nationally.

During a panel discussion at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C., Duberstein disagreed with Stephanopoulos when he suggested that Giuliani and former governor of Massachusetts Mitt Romney have given themselves more flexibility to break from Bush on Iraq in the future by being less vocal than McCain in their support for the president’s proposed troop surge.

“Rudy is very much locked in to the president’s policy,” said Duberstein, adding that Romney, who is at 4 percent in the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll, has no choice but to support the president’s position, given Duberstein’s prediction that a huge preponderance of Republican primary voters will support Bush’s pursuit of a robust policy in Iraq.

Donilon took issue with Duberstein’s suggestion that Giuliani owes his rise to high name recognition.

“McCain is also well known,” said Donilon.

The key for McCain, Duberstein told ABC News following the forum, is for him to “talk about the future as a change agent.”

Click here to go to the ABC NEWS Posting.

~ Vic Lundquist

No responses yet

Feb 28 2007

Profile Image of Mike Laub
Mike Laub

Lets talk to each other, not about each other…

Filed under 2008

“Bull Dog Pundit” wants to talk. That is cool. I’ve been trying to collect the type of information he asks for here. I would also collect similar info for Rudy and McCain.

~ Mike

One response so far

Feb 28 2007

Profile Image of Mike Laub
Mike Laub

“Lincoln-Douglas” and “Romney Giuliani ” debates

Filed under 2008

Hugh Hewitt joined me in calling for a “Lincoln-Douglas” type debate.

As I said; “Lincoln and Douglas had 7 debates. Each debate had this format: one candidate spoke for an hour and a half, then the other candidate spoke for two hours, and then the first candidate spoke for a half hour. The candidates alternated going first. That is 4 hours each debate, with 7 debates, and a total of 28 hours of debate, for just two candidates.”

Lincoln and Douglas weren’t even trying to become president at the time. They were just trying to become Illinois senators. The American presidency is too important to let the media determine who will be POTUS in 2008. These times are more complicated.

We need a substantive debate. I don’t want to hear a Romney ad, and I sure don’t want to see McCain or Giuliani ads. Nothing worth saying can be said in 60 seconds. We need hours of debate. For the good of the nation Romney, and Giuliani should commit to at least as much debate as Lincoln and Douglas, or 14 hours of talking from each candidate. 28 hours of debate between the two of them.

Do you agree with me? If you support Rudy, can you try and get him to com-Mitt (ha-ha) to this? Those who know Mitt Romney (not I) can you get him to talk to Rudy about this?

I would like to see Hillary or Barak involved too.

Here is Hugh’s article.

~ Mike

3 responses so far

Feb 28 2007

Profile Image of Vic Lundquist
Vic Lundquist

Rush Limbaugh: “Pure Hit Piece” Referring to AP Article on Polygamy in Romney’s Past

EIB: “Drive-by Media Out to Get Mitt Romney”

This is the headline for Limbaugh’s February 26th transcript from his “Excellence In Broadcast” radio show. I rarely listen to Limbaugh’s show for many reasons, not least of which is the fact that I am working during the hours of his show. And to be candid, it seems to me that “ditto-heads” sometimes suspend use of their brains and simply drop in behind Mr. Limbaugh and follow him no matter what.

But what cannot be ignored is that Limbaugh has the ear of a very large number of conservative voters and he has a very large megaphone. Others who do listen to him have told me that until recently, Limbaugh has either not mentioned Romney much at all on his show or if he does, his comments on Romney have been very brief and not that supportive.

This transcript from Limbaugh’s daily radio show I think is excellent. The online transcript posting is quite long and includes a number of exchanges as is customary between Limbaugh and several callers. Since the transcript is so long, I have shortened it significantly and included only those excerpts that stand out as meaningful references to Romney. Unless otherwise shown below, the quotes are from Limbaugh:

RUSH: Boy, they are out for Mitt Romney! I saw this over the weekend: “While Mitt Romney condemns polygamy and its prior practice by his Mormon church, the Republican presidential candidate’s great-grandfather had five wives and at least one of his great-great grandfathers had 12. Polygamy was not just a historical footnote, but a prominent element in the family tree of Mitt Romney.” This is an AP story by Jennifer Dobner and Glen Johnson.

Three days ago I received a candid email reply from Jennifer Dobner after I sent her one stating I thought the article she and Johnson wrote covered irrelevant material. I made a number of other arguments and gave her a recommendation on material I thought would be relevant for a strong article. Her reply to me stated in effect she had received many emails, all from those who would not identify themselves. I recommend that others send her messages of their own, but do not get personal or be mean. I think the best approach is to provide ideas for articles that would in effect compare qualifications among all the candidates. Doing so would show Mitt Romney as a stand out. I also think it is best not to mention support of Romney. Dobner’s email address is:

jdobner@ap.org

RUSH: This is unbelievable! How many wives has Romney had? He may be the one guy in the race that’s only had one. Rudy’s been divorced. McCain’s been divorced. I don’t know about some of the others, but why are they doing this? You might ask: Why this kind of a hit piece on Mitt Romney? Obviously they’re afraid of the guy. They’re trying to destroy him. This is just classic Drive-By Media stuff that is designed to cause problems for Romney when he doesn’t promote this; he doesn’t advocate it; he has not lived it. How many of you have a family member or two whose lives, were they to be made public, well, maybe not embarrass you — well, yes, embarrass you. As Ross Perot said, “We all have at least one crazy aunt in the basement,” crazy uncle or what have you. We’re not supposed to analyze the religion of anybody else, but here we go analyzing Mitt Romney’s in this really despicable fashion.

–text skipped–

RUSH: Let me explain the difference in this Mitt Romney business and the way Democrats are treated in this regard. Ted Kennedy’s father — we’re not talking about a great-grandfather or great-great grandfather; we’re talking about father. Ted Kennedy’s father was a Third Reich sympathizer. Franklin Delano Roosevelt had to pull him as ambassador of the Court of Saint James. (For those of you in Rio Linda, that’s Great Britain.) He had to pull him out of there because he was a sympathizer to the Third Reich. Now, we don’t hold this against Teddy. Teddy had nothing to do with that. Just as we don’t hold Mitt Romney’s grandfather, or great-grandfather, against him. But the lib media, the Drive-Bys, are definitely trying to do that. You take a look at who the media really goes after and you’ve gotta wonder whether there’s fear there, fear driving it. Well, they just want to destroy every conservative they can. It’s just part and parcel of the agenda that exists.

–text skipped–

RUSH: We had several large groups that attended baseball games every year. It was my job to sell them and convince them, and they coordinate the ticket sales with their group and their appearance that night at the ball game and pregame festivities. There was a Mormon night. It wasn’t called that, it was Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

CALLER: Mmm-hmm. Right.

RUSH: It was in Kansas City, and I met with the group that put this thing together every year, and I have to tell you, I was impressed with them. The fellowship between these people on that committee, the love they had for each other, it was heartwarming to be part of it. I think there’s obviously something because this is new and this is the first time there are a lot of people going to try to make a whole big deal out of this, as this hit piece story indicates, but there have to be ice breakers, and people like first times. That’s what people liked about the last Super Bowl. There were a lot of firsts in this Super Bowl that aren’t going to happen again. It’s impossible to have the first two black coaches in the Super Bowl ever again.

–text skipped–

RUSH: Look, polygamy is still alive and well in parts of the Islamic world, the Middle East. You can’t criticize that! Of course there’s not one of them running for president (ahem) yet, and that’s what sets this apart. Why is that? Many of us have been trying to analyze for many years: why this personal hatred of George Bush on the part of entertainers and others when they don’t even know him. It’s one thing to disagree with somebody’s policies and so forth, but the personal hatred is just difficult to understand, unless you understand the root of it.

I think I do, and I think it has to do with faith. I think they’re scared of Bush. I think so many people who don’t believe in God have basically a guilt trip about that — not all, but some do — and whenever they are confronted with someone who doesn’t have such doubts but has a firm belief in God, I think they’re threatened immediately. If they then think that a person who has a firm belief in God is using any aspect of that faith as part of a foundation for governing, the way a personal life is lived, I think it’s threatening. There are probably a lot of other psychological factors rooted in this because it’s quite abnormal to personally hate somebody you don’t know. Yet there’s quite a lot of it on the left, and I think as I’ve mentioned to you before, global warming is a religion. It’s not a scientific movement. It’s not a moral movement as Gore wanted to point out.

It’s a pure religion, and as I think Chesterton said, “If you don’t believe in God, you’ll believe in anything,” and people who do believe in God and people who have no problem publicly proclaiming their faith are a huge, huge threat, both psychologically and emotionally to people who don’t share that faith or have any faith at all — other than in inanimate objects like elements of the earth or what have you. I think with Romney, the fact that Mormonism is not understood by people, it’s considered to be a cult, a weirdo sect. It’s considered, by people who don’t know about it, to be very, very serious and devout, and it’s the devout aspect that just sends the left quivering and shaking. We cannot have somebody who’s going to be judgmental, can’t have somebody who has absolutes of right and wrong and good or bad. We can’t have somebody like that running the country. No, no, no. That’s why the left feels like they are imprisoned when such people have positions of power.

–text skipped—

CALLER: Not to belabor the point, but on the Mitt Romney thing, I just want to point out to you, last month’s issue of the AARP magazine had a little survey in it right at the beginning of the book. It was entitled, “Is America ready for…?” It was the Obama thing. Is America ready for Obama? Of course the response was yes, and then the next question was, “Is America ready for a woman president?” Then, of course, overwhelming response was yes. But what really appalled me, was the third question: “Is America ready for a Mormon president?”

RUSH: Well, let me ask you this. Dingy Harry is a Mormon. He is. Dingy Harry is a Mormon from Utah. If Dingy Harry were running for president, do you think we’d see stories about polygamy in his background or in the Mormon church at all? Do you think the same Drive-Bys would be trying to destroy Dingy Harry were he running for president?

CALLER: Oh, I doubt it. I wouldn’t be surprised if AARP contributes to Dingy Harry.

RUSH: Oh, that’s probably true. Anyway, look, there is no question there’s a lot of controversy and fear over Mormons, and so forth in this country, but to run a hit piece? The fact that his grandfather or great-grandfather were polygamist is no bearing on him. He’s not led his life that way at all. This is a pure hit piece. It’s not based on his Mormonism. It’s happening because he’s conservative.

–text skipped–

If you wish to read the entire transcript from Rush Limbaugh’s radio show on this topic, click here. There are some comments sprinkled throughout this show that are quite humorous and overall I think the entire transcript is worth reading. There are other items about Romney that I did not include.

~ Vic Lundquist

7 responses so far

Feb 28 2007

Profile Image of Kyle
Kyle

Mitt Packs Them In At NH Fundraiser

Filed under 2008

Here’s a report from Jame Pindell at the Boston Globe:

Over 350 people bought tickets to quickly sell out a local Republican fund-raiser in New Hampshire this week featuring former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, organizers say.

Romney will be the keynote speaker at a Lincoln Day Dinner Thursday night sponsored by the New Hampshire Republican committees of Derry, Hampton, and Portsmouth.

Last year, former U.S. Senator Bill Frist addressed a less-than-sellout crowd at the event.

I continue to see signs that the early state strategy of the Romney campaign is working.

-Kyle Joseph Farmer

No responses yet

Feb 28 2007

Profile Image of Mike Laub
Mike Laub

“It is the economy, stupid”

Filed under 2008

At one point the Dow industrial average was down more than 546 points, or 4.3 percent, at 12,086, but it recovered some ground in the last 90 minutes of trading to close at 12,216.24, down 416.02 points, or 3.3 percent, the worst drop since Sept. 17, 2001. The Dow rose last week to both a closing and an intraday record.

Click here for Romney’s business record.

~ Mike

4 responses so far

Feb 27 2007

Profile Image of Mike Laub
Mike Laub

He calls for a mop

Filed under 2008

This from the blog “My Man Mitt”:

The Boston Globe’s Scott Hellman loves to swing at Romney. Any tidbit he can find about the man, the campaign, and the race is grist for his mill. So when some outside consultant hands him a PPT deck laying out a supposed roadmap for Governor Romney’s campaign… he calls for a mop and salivates. OK.. That was a bit over-dramatic… but you get the point.

So first thing to note… this is NOT the campaign’s roadmap. It’s doubtful the Governor ever saw it. This type of analysis comes in unsolicited all the time. It’s silly to think that Spencer Zwick has this laminated in his coat vest.

Click here for the rest of the post.

No responses yet

Feb 27 2007

Profile Image of Mike Laub
Mike Laub

This just in: Joy Behar from “The View” will not vote Romney!

Filed under 2008

After taking some liberties with Catholicism, Behar lets the audience know that when it comes to anti-Semitism, she will have none of it.

She admitted that she would not vote for Mitt Romney and that’s because he announced his bid for the presidency in front of the Ford building. Ford, she said, was ‘a big, big, Hitler supporter.’ This is a claim that not even those who charge Ford with being an anti-Semite make. Leaving Ford aside, it’s nice to know that these ex-Catholic ladies have little tolerance for anti-Semitism.

Click here for the article.

~ Mike

4 responses so far

Feb 27 2007

Profile Image of Mike Laub
Mike Laub

Rush Limbaugh: Drive-By Media Out to Get Mitt Romney

Filed under 2008

Thanks Don!

You might ask: Why this kind of a hit piece on Mitt Romney? Obviously they’re afraid of the guy. They’re trying to destroy him. This is just classic Drive-By Media stuff that is designed to cause problems for Romney when he doesn’t promote this; he doesn’t advocate it; he has not lived it. How many of you have a family member or two whose lives, were they to be made public, well, maybe not embarrass you — well, yes, embarrass you. As Ross Perot said, “We all have at least one crazy aunt in the basement,” crazy uncle or what have you. We’re not supposed to analyze the religion of anybody else, but here we go analyzing Mitt Romney’s in this really despicable fashion.

RUSH: Let me explain the difference in this Mitt Romney business and the way Democrats are treated in this regard. Ted Kennedy’s father — we’re not talking about a great-grandfather or great-great grandfather; we’re talking about father. Ted Kennedy’s father was a Third Reich sympathizer. Franklin Delano Roosevelt had to pull him as ambassador of the Court of Saint James. (For those of you in Rio Linda, that’s Great Britain.) He had to pull him out of there because he was a sympathizer to the Third Reich. Now, we don’t hold this against Teddy. Teddy had nothing to do with that. Just as we don’t hold Mitt Romney’s grandfather, or great-grandfather, against him. But the lib media, the Drive-Bys, are definitely trying to do that. You take a look at who the media really goes after and you’ve gotta wonder whether there’s fear there, fear driving it. Well, they just want to destroy every conservative they can. It’s just part and parcel of the agenda that exists.

Rush says the media is afraid of Romney? Watch the video at the top of this page to see why the media is afraid of Mitt.
~ Mike

One response so far

Older Posts »